ANTINOUVEAUANTIDISESTABLISHMENTARIANISM

Monday, January 22, 2007

NOBODY CARES IF CHRISTIAN FUNDIES RULE THIS COUNTRY

I placed the entire text of Section 220 of SB 1 in the previous post. This wection was taken out of SB 1 and that passed it overwhelmingly. basically, now, paid lobbyists are not accountable. and Christian fundamentalist organizations can pay lobbyists ("grassroots" that's a hoot) without... Sign in to see full entry.

Friday, January 19, 2007

HERE'S SB 1 SEC 220 -- now tell me how this hurts grassroots & christians

S.1 To provide greater transparency in the legislative process. (Placed on Calendar in Senate) SEC. 220. DISCLOSURE OF PAID EFFORTS TO STIMULATE GRASSROOTS LOBBYING. (a) Definitions- Section 3 of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1602) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (7), by adding at the end of the following:... Sign in to see full entry.

Thursday, January 18, 2007

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SENATOR IN SUPPORT OF SB 1

this bill is an ethics bill. it is also a "sunshine" bill that requires disclosure of groups that pay "grassroots" lobbyists. (sec 220) some fundamentalist Christians have a problem with this sec 220, but it does nothing to limit free speech or expression of religion. personally i think this bill is... Sign in to see full entry.

Friday, January 12, 2007

FUNDMENTALIST CHRISTIANS DON'T WANT TO BE ACCOUNTABLE

If you would, please read the post below, click on the link to the Senate Bill ( which has been referenced by at least one Christian writer here on Blogit), and see that this bill does not restrict exercise of religion; rather, it holds accountable lobbyists who receive funds from basically any... Sign in to see full entry.

Thursday, January 11, 2007

WHAT'S WRONG WITH SB 1 SEC 220 --NOTHING THAT I CAN SEE

HERE'S THE LINK - [S.1.PCS] - click on it, then scroll down to SEC. 220. DISCLOSURE OF PAID EFFORTS TO STIMULATE GRASSROOTS LOBBYING. and click again [S.1.PCS] It requires disclosure, as far as I can see -- that's all. And that seems fair, doesn't it? If someone is paid to lobby congress, rather... Sign in to see full entry.

IS INTELLIGENT DESIGN SCIENCE?

Here is an article that says it is. Intelligent Design is a Scie... The first error here is in assuming that Darwin's Origin of Species embodies the whole of explanation of the Theory of Evolution. The second paragraph of this work is based on that assumption. The work is quite oversimplified, just... Sign in to see full entry.

Monday, January 8, 2007

WHAT DOES THE WORD MEAN AGAIN?

in response to.Dave There was a time when in Western Europe, only one religion and only one church was recognized. No other religion, no other form of that religion was tolerated. Kings bowed to the church's leaders and asked their blessing on their ascension to the throne. If my perception of... Sign in to see full entry.

Tuesday, January 2, 2007

DO YOU KNOW WHAT THIS WORD MEANS?

let's boil it down ESTABLISHMENT -- establishment of a government sponsored religion. This was the state of Europe for more than a millennium -- The Church was the government approved religion. No other was. Many people were burned at the stake, tortured, or massacred who did not fall in step with... Sign in to see full entry.

Monday, January 1, 2007

I HAVE JUST INVENTED WHAT NOW HAS TO BE THE LONGEST WORD

IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Do you understand what it means? more later. Sign in to see full entry.

Friday, November 10, 2006

CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES DISAPPOINTED OVER DEMS WIN

means that they cannot lord it over the rest of us as they would please. I see some of them here on Blogit thinking that it is such a tragedy that maybe this country will not become Christian dominated after all. They have amply demonstrated, across the country and here on Blogit, that they cannot... Sign in to see full entry.

Page: << First  < Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 ..  Next > Last >> 

Headlines (What is this?)

Referrals - About Us - Press - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Conduct Policy
Copyright © 2017 Shaycom Corporation. All rights reserved.