Archie's Look at the News: Michael Jackson Not Guilty

By archiew - About Me - E-mail this page - Add to My Favorites - Add to Blog List - See other blogs in Opinion

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Michael Jackson Not Guilty

The prosecutor should be charged with malfeasance! Were I on the jury, I would have found him not guilty as well. What physical evidence did they have against him? What was the credibility of the prosecution witnesses? From what I have read, the decision was correct. That does not mean the defendant is innocent; it is just that the prosecutor was sloppy and didn't plan this thing through. Juries must convict based on facts, not innuendo, and innuendo is all the prosecutor had. Think what you... Sign in to see full entry.

Previous: Area 51 a Nudist Camp for High Ranking Military Officers? - New Entries - Next: Terri Sciavo's Autopsy Shows Us . . .

Headlines (What is this?)