Comments on Another Perfuntory Flipping

Go to Help, I'm a Rock!!Add a commentGo to Another Perfuntory Flipping

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ciel
That is a very good idea.  I only recently noticed that option at Blogit.
I am sure that it wasn't available when I was last here.
Definitely a worthwhile new feature.

posted by Jack_Flash on June 18, 2009 at 12:46 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Re: Re: Re: ciel
I just go to 'my account' and run down through the comments I've made in others' blogs, and see if anyone responded.  It's more fun, of course, when someone does.

posted by Ciel on June 16, 2009 at 3:32 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Re: Re: ciel

I will get to your blogs more often.  I always seem to get started so late that I don't
have time to get a complete blogathon run.  I need to reorganize.
If I don't do that, how can I ever become a rich and famous blogger?

Blogit needs a thing that lists replies to your comments.

posted by Jack_Flash on June 16, 2009 at 3:24 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Re: ciel

Philosophers... like a conceptual food-fight, flinging diatribes, -isms and memes around the dining hall...

If you take a stroll through my Universe blog, you'll know more of my zone.  "Everything=One" and stuff like that... but each thing has its own proper place, too.   I like my philosphies to have practical application, too. 

posted by Ciel on June 15, 2009 at 9:53 PM | link to this | reply

Re: ciel

You are right about the Zen Universe.  There is no duality there, which pretty much eliminates
the something/nothing separation.

I live in the Zen Zone.  I don't know about yours in any detail.

As far as philosophers, they seem to struggle with all questions.
They bring preconceptions to the table and throw them at one another.

posted by Jack_Flash on June 10, 2009 at 12:58 PM | link to this | reply

Re: Re: ciel
I can see how philosphers might struggle with that question.  I say they are probably both true, depending on from where one views the Universe.  The second would be true, I suppose, in a Zen Universe.  The first is true in mine.

posted by Ciel on June 9, 2009 at 11:19 PM | link to this | reply

Re: ciel

I forgot to mention one thing on my preceding comment.  Is nothing a thing in itself, or is everything nothing?  I anxiously await your response.

  Butterfly dreaming of being a man........ JJ

posted by Jack_Flash on June 2, 2009 at 3:04 AM | link to this | reply

Re: ciel
There is, unknown to the general public, something that is less than 0.0000001.  It is 0.000000099.  That is 0.00000001 less than 0.0000001.  That may seem trivial, but it is, nevertheless, quite true.  Do not ever make the mistake of thinking that mathematics cannot trick you with the most insignificant of phenomena.  Einstein used it to prove that space was time in relationship to the relative speed of matter.  We aren't all getting fatter, we are just traveling faster through space.

posted by Jack_Flash on June 2, 2009 at 2:52 AM | link to this | reply

Re: sam
Fun is where it's at.  There are far too many people who have no understanding of that.  They say stuff like ''What is the meaning of life?''  Fun is the meaning of life, at least as long as it is supervised by a compassionate conscience.  What more can there be?  Is that not what heaven will be all about?  If not, I will take a sturdy ice chest and go to hell to raise a little hell.

posted by Jack_Flash on June 2, 2009 at 2:39 AM | link to this | reply

It cannot be denied.
Facts is facts.  Nothing is less than .0000001.  However, nothing is a thing in itself, therefore, nothing is something.  It is still less than .0000001.  Isn't that something?

posted by Ciel on May 30, 2009 at 3:45 PM | link to this | reply

Just so you are having fun, that is all that truly matters! sam

posted by sam444 on May 29, 2009 at 6:03 AM | link to this | reply