Comments on Why is it necessary to read so much if you want to write?

Go to WRITERS WRITEAdd a commentGo to Why is it necessary to read so much if you want to write?

AlienFemale
I don't like wasting my time, either.  Most of the time I will not stay with a poor book unless it's in a favorite genre such as science fiction.  There I quiz myself about what I might have done to make it a better read.  In other genres I usually try to remember not to make the same mistakes as the culprit who authored the work that has wasted my time.  I don't really want to feel superior.  I want to learn to do better.

posted by notapoet on January 31, 2008 at 3:03 AM | link to this | reply

SouthernPeach
I understand your sentiments about both trash and the classics.  I, too, feel mystified as to how a lot of not very good writing ever manages to be published.  I do, however, find that I can finish very little that I don't consider at least competent.  I'll usually stick through to the better end in a genre I particularly enjoy, such as science fiction, but give up in disgust on a lot of other material.  But poor storytelling and less than competent mechanics serves its purpose in getting me fired up to prove that I can do better.  Oh, and welcome to Blogit.  I hope you enjoy a long and happy stay here.

posted by notapoet on January 31, 2008 at 2:57 AM | link to this | reply

 I can't read a trash. It doesn't make me feel superior, it makes me feel that I am wasting my precious time.

posted by AlienFemale on January 29, 2008 at 1:33 PM | link to this | reply

I like reading trash interspersed with the classics. The trash makes me feel superior as a writer and the classics inferior. So much crap is published that I know is worse than my writing.

posted by SouthernPeach on January 28, 2008 at 11:46 AM | link to this | reply