Comments on An open letter to knucklehead

Go to Religion in the Modern WorldAdd a commentGo to An open letter to knucklehead

Oddy - I find your last comment rather astounding

I'm not about to thank you for correcting a situation that never should have happened in the first place but I will accept your apology.

What I find astounding is how you can maintain an ongoing crusade against certain people on this site yet claim to forget all of the important details that you have clearly learned at one time about them.

Yes, our dialogue was cordial at one time but following the degeneration of that discourse is not that difficult (At least for me because I have somewhat of a decent memory). Despite the fact that your long deleted posts carry some of the chronological record of this degeneration, my still existing posts provide enough of an outline to paint a clear picture. I could go on about who started it, who said what, or who's fault it all is but there is no point in that. Someday you will just simply have to accept that whatever insults or transgressions you feel that you are enduring at the hands of those whom you have chosen as adversaries, you have clearly asked for.  

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 9:37 PM | link to this | reply

Wow, dialogue from 3 years ago!
How refreshing, I’d forgotten we were ever that cordial to one another.  I’m certain you will accuse me of lying but I had absolutely no recollection of this, not that it displays that much about your finances anyway.  Nonetheless, because you find it offensive, I’m going to delete the post, as you requested earlier.  And I also openly apologize for this obvious misunderstanding.

posted by Oddy on December 4, 2007 at 1:52 PM | link to this | reply

Oddy - ahh yes the crawfish impersonation where you swim backwards

I forgot about that part of your repetoire. Of course you didn't know about what you claim to not know anything about even though you wrote about it. I'm going to have to get some of that bottled amnesia you keep drinking. HERE we are discussing it.  Even after my deleting a couple of the comments that were too specific (you know, because I love to brag about it) you still demonstrate a thorough knowledge of what you claim to know nothing about.

Too bad you weren't a real messiah, you could just snap your fingers and have us all conveniently forget whatever you wanted us to as well.

 

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 1:33 PM | link to this | reply

Gomedome…………obviously I cannot convince you but
you have to be aware that I know absolutely nothing about your financial situation.  But I do not wish to belabor the point, I’m standing down. 

posted by Oddy on December 4, 2007 at 1:06 PM | link to this | reply

David1Spirit - okay, I confess, I'm shameless, I admit it freely

I haven't been in the top ten for awhile here on Blogit, I have a deal going that forces me to hang out near the phone and saw the opportunity to drive my post up in the rankings. Who better to use for this than someone who is just begging for a beating? A side bonus being the satisfaction of the irony in having someone who would love to see me censured facilitate greater readership for my blog . . . c'mon, you have to find that funny? No?

Okay, so my sense of humor needs a bit of work.  

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 1:06 PM | link to this | reply

Oddy - that isn't going to work this time

You obviously never read the article you dropped the link for. It is almost irrelevant to your post and if anything supports the complete opposite of your position. And that is aside from the remaining fact that you did not reference it once in your post.

Do you not get embarrassed by being exposed like this? Is there a guilt gene or something that you are missing? It's okay if this is the case, far be it from me to pick on the handicapped.   

 

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 12:59 PM | link to this | reply

Gomedome, why don't you ignore the immature IDIOT, which is what he is!
Or better stilll just block him again. He isn't worth the space you donate to him on your very intelligent and insightful posts.

posted by David1Spirit on December 4, 2007 at 12:54 PM | link to this | reply

Good grief! You people are the epitome of paranoia.

posted by Oddy on December 4, 2007 at 12:48 PM | link to this | reply

Ariala - claiming the post is about someone else is the standard escape

mechanism but in this case, all reference qualifiers are known and irrefutable.

As a precaution (and a joke) I added the last line in this post stating that I wasn't speaking of anyone specifically. . . but that isn't even the funniest part. There is a link left a couple of comments back that is supposedly what the post in question is all about. Methinks someone who is attempting to pull the wool over my eyes Googled a few keywords to hurriedly find a link supporting the lie. It goes to show that if someone is going to be at least a decent liar, they should be willing to put a little effort into it. . . . . the link leads to a post that completely supports the opposite of my detractor's position. It could not have been read prior or possibly be a worse choice to back this specific contention . . . too funny.  

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 12:04 PM | link to this | reply

Gome, this is why I didn't challenge a recent post that was OBVIOUSLY
intended for me...for the VERY FACT that I would have been told it was about someone else...too much language and refrences related to stuff of my past to not be about me, and I knew that the author had a bias against me (no matter what I said, the person didn't believe me.  Fack it. I'm done there.) It has taught me that I am way too trusting and forgiving, only to be stabbed in the back over and over and over again...oh well...sorry for your troubles, too.

posted by Ariala on December 4, 2007 at 11:49 AM | link to this | reply

Oddy - how incredibly lame and typical of your deception

The post in question makes absolutely no reference to an offsite web page. It quite clearly states in plain and irrefutable English for anyone with half a brain to see, that you are referencing only this site and it's participants. What else is new however? You demonstrate yet again your penchant for lying your way out of every situation you put yourself in one more time.

Why can't you tell the truth at least some of the time like a normal wannabe messiah?

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 11:04 AM | link to this | reply

If you must see it, here's the link of reference...

 

***   Here   ***

Dude, everything is not about you, I'm just writing my own blog!  I promise!

posted by Oddy on December 4, 2007 at 10:53 AM | link to this | reply

Pat_B - "Prof. Gome" - it has a nice ring to it . . doesn't it?
I think I've reached my bullshit threshold with a certain individual. If that was his goal, he's succeeded. It has to be the goal, no one can be that screwed up in their thinking.

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 10:45 AM | link to this | reply

Again, Prof. Gome... you've hit the proverbial nail & driven it home. :)

posted by Pat_B on December 4, 2007 at 9:02 AM | link to this | reply

posted by afzal50 on December 4, 2007 at 8:57 AM | link to this | reply

sam444 - it isn't really trouble, it's more a case of where I have been

swatting a pesky mosquito the entire time I've been on Blogit.

That analogy should adequately depict how insignificant I view this individual's perspective but at the same time, mosquitoes are a nuisance.

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 8:33 AM | link to this | reply

oddy - as I said in this post, the blogger in question would most likely

attempt to lie their way out of it as they always do.

You want to imply that you were speaking of someone else? Using deflecting and irrelevant lines such as this: "I mean the internet is full of all sorts of atheist banter." is just another one of your attempts to evade taking responsibility for your callous words. The context of your post which anyone can read HERE clearly states that you are speaking of atheists on this site which you further solidify with this statement: "And yet, we have those here who obviously take pleasure in the fact that they are wealthy; and who boast openly in the childish belief that the magnitude of their finances somehow validates their opinions and perspective." Then when it is considered that the entire basis of your "expertise" about atheists is based on just two people (how utterly ridiculous is that?) and that the other person has written posts about struggling financially between jobs over the past few years, there is no mistaking who you are speaking of.

Further, there is only one way you could possibly know about my financial status. You must have asked because I never mention it, absolutely never. It is a fundamental element of my privacy and one that you have so callously invaded with yet another of your manufactured vilifications. One more time, I have to ask you to put up or shut up. You've made a statement, thinly veiled but where everyone that reads your posts knows exactly who you are speaking of. One example of what you claim is all that it will take. Just one and I will publicly apologize for being so crass as to mention personal wealth amongst a community of people that are for the most part struggling financially.

If you cannot provide this proof at least have the decency to remove the offending post. What I do expect from you however are just more of your lies.

The man that would have us uplift goodness . . . how utterly friggin ridiculous.

posted by gomedome on December 4, 2007 at 8:26 AM | link to this | reply

SORRY FOR THE TROUBLE>>>>>AN EXCELLENT VIEW POINT>>>>>>>>SAM

posted by sam444 on December 4, 2007 at 7:58 AM | link to this | reply

Gomedome……..I wonder if perhaps the blogger you’re referring to here is
talking about someone else?  I mean, the internet is full of all sorts of atheistic banter.  And you’re not even an atheist!  Excuse me for saying this, but you’re either quite vain (or either paranoid) to fantasize that certain posting is all about you; that is, if it doesn’t even refer to you directly.  Try to relax a bit and be good.  Did you ever stop to wonder that if you perceive something as untrue about yourself then the reference might just be toward someone else?  And then, of course, if you feel that someone’s blog is speaking to you, who knows, it might be God’s way of telling you something.  Anyway, have a great day and Be good!  Your loving friend….Odysseus   

posted by Oddy on December 4, 2007 at 7:49 AM | link to this | reply