Go to Afzal 's view
- Add a comment
- Go to Random thoughts on " EROTICISM"
TranscendentalChild,
Thanks.
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 5:43 PM
| link to this | reply
food4thought,
Thanks for stopping by!
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 5:42 PM
| link to this | reply
Afzal...
Yes... until those crazy Christians (Puritans) brought their ideas and ideals into the "New World" about how it should be done... just one of the many things we have to thank them for ... Sexual hang-ups.
posted by
Transcendental_Child
on January 6, 2007 at 4:09 PM
| link to this | reply
Afzal...
I think maybe you are using eroticism where you should be using preversion. It could just be that difference in the language. Erotic cars are not sexy (not really, exciting yes, but not sexy) but there are no perverse cars. Or did I get it all wrong?
posted by
food4thought
on January 6, 2007 at 3:50 PM
| link to this | reply
Bhaskar, please read "there " instead of "thier"
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 2:11 PM
| link to this | reply
OFFBEATS,
Thanks .
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 2:09 PM
| link to this | reply
afzal
Interesting and probably true~
posted by
Offy
on January 6, 2007 at 2:06 PM
| link to this | reply
Frankenkitty ,
Thanks for stopping by with such a balanced and rational comment .YOu have a broad,liberal , and positive mind . Take care.
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 1:59 PM
| link to this | reply
Afzal
thank you for clarifying!
posted by
Presley
on January 6, 2007 at 1:58 PM
| link to this | reply
Presley,
What I discussed was the view of people of some faith . You or me for that matter don't have to necessarily agree .We may differ but cannot say that we hold the best view in ourselves . Difference of opion is the sign of intellectual health of a society .I do appreciate your opinion and shall try to figure out my failures in not being able to impress my views in the Western perspective of eroticism .Thanks for your critical comment .
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 1:55 PM
| link to this | reply
Bhaskar,
Please don't assert your personal opinion to be the gospel Truth . Their are millions of people who may differ from your opinion or my opinion .No body should act as pontif of truth in matters of beliefs. It's just another and opposite view of things which are seen by some other people on the planet.You have a right to disagree but cannot force your opinion on others . Here you go wrong .
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 1:44 PM
| link to this | reply
Afzal
I'm interpreting your last paragraph to mean that homosexuality and sex between unmarried people is why AIDS exists and does so as God's punishment? If my interpretation is correct, I disagree with your theory. If my interpretation is filtered, please clarify what you were saying.
posted by
Presley
on January 6, 2007 at 1:02 PM
| link to this | reply
Afzal50, I don't think people
can stay happily married without eroticism in their marriage. I know I couldn't. Maybe my thinking is primal, however, I do not believe infidelity for the purpose of lust is acceptable either. Some people get married for financial reasons, which has little to with love, but maybe something to do with eroticism.
Either way, I don't believe every person on the planet needs to get married and procreate, because this stresses the available resources of the planet and illogically creates extreme poverty and disease without the help of sexual deviancy. Maybe we should teach the world about responsible lifestyles instead of abstinence for the sake of decency alone. Take care and have a nice weekend
posted by
Flumpystalls3000
on January 6, 2007 at 12:52 PM
| link to this | reply
Afzal
Hurricanes, earthquakes, pestilence, disease etc., are all man's creations, not God's. Religion, God... are not so commonplace to be running away from life. Let me assure you Afzal that there is no such thing as aberration in God's creation. Please don't get the message wrong. Justification just doesn't exist. If I am not clear I will give a detailed post on it, but do read and get things in the right perspective. I say this with utter confidence.
posted by
Bhaskar.ing
on January 6, 2007 at 11:12 AM
| link to this | reply
Bhaskar,
I am just talking about abberations and abnormalities .God has created lot of things but has also warned us to stay away from those things . He knows better why he has warned us from those things. He has created storms, Hurricanes and earthquaqes does it mean that we need to embrace them and not run for life just because its God's creatation, God made poisonous things so we need to take it because God made it .Thanks for stopping by !
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 11:02 AM
| link to this | reply
Afzal
Eroticism is divine and never a curse. God is never revengeful. The greatest of energy of all that lives is sexual energy, given by God Himself. So how can He be angry? I just don't understand the equation of what you want to say. No, you've got it all wrong.
posted by
Bhaskar.ing
on January 6, 2007 at 10:48 AM
| link to this | reply
MiaElla ,
Thanks for stopping by ~!
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 10:43 AM
| link to this | reply
Eroticism
To me is more about a powerful connection between two people...that when combined is so powerful...it's beyond sexy...beyond lustful...it's love...it's desire...it's passion...it's beautiful.
posted by
MiaElla
on January 6, 2007 at 10:37 AM
| link to this | reply
Sunny,
Thanks .
posted by
afzal50
on January 6, 2007 at 10:27 AM
| link to this | reply
Afzal
Hmmmmm... 
I'm not sure I agree, or even sure of what you are saying here.
I don't believe that any sexual behavior is "deviant", unless it is not between two consenting adults. Religions overplay the issues on sex, in order to control the masses to their personal gains.
Sex is a natural experience, just as any other experience we have as humans.
There is a lot that I could say on this issue.
posted by
Afzal_Sunny7
on January 6, 2007 at 10:25 AM
| link to this | reply