Go to Afzal 's view
- Add a comment
- Go to Should virginity be the criteria of chastity .
azal
you're welcome!
posted by
Nanaroo
on July 24, 2006 at 6:04 PM
| link to this | reply
OFFBEATS,Thank you for your valuable comment.
posted by
afzal50
on July 24, 2006 at 6:04 PM
| link to this | reply
Nanaroo,You are absolutely correct . I agree with you .Thanks.
posted by
afzal50
on July 24, 2006 at 6:03 PM
| link to this | reply
afza
I think the whole virgin issue is highly over rated in marriage. It is a matter of personal choice for the woman and if the man doesn't like it.......well too bad for him. That's just my opinion though!!
posted by
Offy
on July 24, 2006 at 5:57 PM
| link to this | reply
afzal
I may be just offering a 'Western' view of this question but I take great issue with how a part of a woman's anatomy should affect her value. I understand that history and culture has a lot to do with how this is viewed but... in my opionion, anatomy should not be equated with value in any way!!!
posted by
Nanaroo
on July 24, 2006 at 5:54 PM
| link to this | reply
Blackcat30, Thanks for stopping by!
posted by
afzal50
on July 24, 2006 at 5:49 PM
| link to this | reply
Wow. Hmmm...
I see no problem with virgins getting married, but perhaps the man should remain a virgin also? It seems only fair.
posted by
-blackcat
on July 24, 2006 at 5:47 PM
| link to this | reply