Go to If I get smart with you....how will you know?
- Add a comment
- Go to The Mullah Madam? Hillary Clinton Takes Money from Pro-Regime Iranians...
flame-thrower
Thank you for your comments....you are too kind....
I look forward to reading your writings on Nigeria......
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on January 21, 2006 at 2:49 PM
| link to this | reply
I have just read your article on Mrs Clinton who is already dreaming of being Mrs Johnson Sirleaf president of Liberia or Michelet Bachelet of Chile. I was not surprised to read that she take monies from the Iranians. Her other half did they same. He took monies from the Suadis for his second term campaign and when he left office, he is acting as PRO for the Saudi Oil company. For those who say Bush loves Oil, they have to think twice, the lovers of Oil are not the Republicans but the Democrats. Thanks for bringing up the topic.
posted by
Flame-thrower
on January 21, 2006 at 2:31 PM
| link to this | reply
Cameroon is majority Christian and Animist country with a Moslem minority that is not militant like in neighbouring Nigeria. If there is going to be anything like civilwar, they won't be the cause nor can they cause it. The problem of Cameroon will come from the English-speaking minority that I have treated here some time ago gave the reason. If you are interested, here is a link:http://www.postwatchmagazine.com/2005/11/celebrating_44_.html#more. It is an article that I wrote and which was published here in parts and in full in two dot.com magazines. It will help you to understand cameroon more. On Nigeria, I am preparing to comeup with something soon. However, what is presently going on is the result of long coruption under military. The Niger Delta that produces Nigerian Oil could easily be the least developed part of the Country hence the disturbance.May I thank you for your honesty. God Bless.
posted by
Flame-thrower
on January 21, 2006 at 2:27 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin this is an excellent post. Someone on here ask what the
Clintons did that has not been done in this administration? Well there was rape, pillage and talk about death it was not on foreign soil but in many places people have not been charged with. There has not been a more corrupt presidency than that of the Clintons. I do apologize but I voted for him, not once but twice. I was a real jerk. I do know better now.
I changed parties! I will have an open mind to right and wrong. I will not vote ever again because someone is in a certain party but because they are attempting to do what is right. I do believe there is no comparison between then and now as far as honesty, morality, and loyalty to the people. (people who don't like anything about him, who do not even know what he is doing in their favor)
I have lived through a lot of presidents beginning with Franklin D. Roosevelt. Mine has always been a political family, I was always interested in politics. Clintons were Washington's Louisiana Longs.
posted by
Justi
on January 21, 2006 at 9:23 AM
| link to this | reply
CORBIN
That must a Clinton thing! Haven't they always talked out of two mouths? Quite frankly, where did any one get the idea that our President has been soft on Iran? I think he has been clear since day one on his position regarding Iran....so did I miss something?
When did the former Clinton ever take any "real" responsibility for ignoring Iran during his 8 years in the White House? This did not happen over night in old Iran..
I suppose it doesn't really surprise me any, does it you? Bush gets blamed for OBL killing Americans, instead of OBL. Bush gets blamed for Iraq, while Saddam becomes a martyr, and because there was no WMD, I guess Bush killed and tortured hundreds of thousands over these last 30 years? Hillary takes money from Pro Regime Iranians and I will lay you odds... they will make her out to be a victim!
The true facts of the matter is how you view the globe. We do not live in the same world as we did before 911. We can not fight wars like our fathers, we must as the greatest nation on this planet be able to understand, the cost of freedom has become different. We must be able to protect Americans and America's interest around the world at any cost. I do believe in order to be effective in that effort, we are going to have to get used to the fact that this world is a different one, and we are going to have to fight wars differently...America's best interest lays in having a free world, but we as a people must learn to have a stomach for it. While the military has done an outstanding job in other area's, we need to look at a more effective solution to these situations...
Yes, I knew you were kidding me yesterday..I got so busy I did not have a chance to get back with you!!Now I need my coffee...have a great day my friend!
posted by
Offy
on January 21, 2006 at 4:06 AM
| link to this | reply
Sarooster...
I appreciate your comments and input....thank you for actually addressing the topic at hand.....
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on January 21, 2006 at 3:18 AM
| link to this | reply
Thanks for bringing this to light corbin.
Mrs. Clinton is an assault weapon of many kinds and calibers!!
posted by
sarooster
on January 21, 2006 at 3:05 AM
| link to this | reply
Blanche
There are more officials indicted under this administration for financial and other misconduct than any other since Reagan.
That is your most outlandish comments yet...please be specific ...to my knowledge there has been one member of this administration indicted....
Scooter Libby...who else?
The Clinton Administration???
CRIME STATS
- Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton administration who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
- Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33
- Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61
- Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on January 21, 2006 at 3:00 AM
| link to this | reply
Blanche
In a way I can understand the desire to forget the Clinton Administration...who wouldn't....
But you can't sweep the truth under the rug. Why is it that Liberals want to "re-write" history. A surplus isn't a surplus until the year ends and its on the books. We had a couple of years that were surpluses. The surpluses to which you refer were projected surpluses.....kind of like in next 10 years I plan to make X number of dollars....will I make that, If things go to plan......
The tech bubble burst before Clinton left office.......and every thing was headed down....
Do you remember that little thingy called 9-11? The stock market lost over 1000 points in a few days.......and well over a million jobs were wiped out in a couple of weeks. As to the deficits....you are aware that we are at war? We have been hit by the greatest natural disaster ever to hit the US and you think we should still be having surpluses......
Yet through all of this the economy is growing at a rat faster than anytime under BJ Bill........Now there's some history for you.
But what does that have to do with Hillary and her taking money from the likes that she is condemning GW over??? That is the actual subject of my post.....
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on January 21, 2006 at 2:53 AM
| link to this | reply
Often Easier to See What Others Do and Not Self then Justify Own Actions
posted by
Dr_JPT
on January 20, 2006 at 7:49 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin et al,
What has Clinton done that compares to the current situation? During the Clinton Administration there was a budget surplus, now there's a deficit that is growing by billions every day that isn't fully accounted for because the Iraq war is "off the books".
There are more officials indicted under this administration for financial and other misconduct than any other since Reagan. It's time to stop playing "Blame Clinton". The Republicans have been in power since 2000, Clinton's out of the picture. Let's deal with the situation we have now.
posted by
Blanche.
on January 20, 2006 at 7:05 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin Dallas
Hi.. I am not surprised by this.. I remember Travel Gate and Vince Foster!
posted by
BrightIrish
on January 20, 2006 at 7:00 PM
| link to this | reply
Some things never take
me by surprise...Thanks again for bringing the facts to light!
posted by
ms_bradrock
on January 20, 2006 at 6:41 PM
| link to this | reply
Actually, that should read, "drugs for weapons" deal by Ollie North
remember him?
posted by
Blanche.
on January 20, 2006 at 6:40 PM
| link to this | reply
Nice work, Corbin,
but, as usual, deflecting from the Jack Abramoff junkets and handouts to Tom Delay and other RNC members. $1,000? Come on, even Ollie North got a set of snow tires during the Iran Contra affair, and speaking of Iran-Contra, whatever happened to the "money for drugs" scandal during the Reagan regime, I mean, administration?
posted by
Blanche.
on January 20, 2006 at 6:37 PM
| link to this | reply
Shadow......
LOL....I hadn't considered that one........
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on January 20, 2006 at 4:41 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin,
Mmmmmm..........seems like everyone in the Clinton clan is into hand jobs here. Shadow
posted by
Keshet
on January 20, 2006 at 4:32 PM
| link to this | reply