Comments on You Know What They Say About Assuming.

Go to Reality TherapyAdd a commentGo to You Know What They Say About Assuming.

Jo,
Thank you for the compliment, glad you like the picture.

posted by realitytherapy on October 23, 2005 at 9:50 AM | link to this | reply

Hey Joe,
Glad to know I am not alone in my quest for people free pictures.

posted by realitytherapy on October 23, 2005 at 9:50 AM | link to this | reply

realitytherapy
When I take pictures, I try to shoot them free of people, too. I get the same comments from them.

posted by Joe_Love on October 23, 2005 at 12:56 AM | link to this | reply

Beautiful Pic

Jo

posted by brisbane_artist on October 22, 2005 at 12:48 PM | link to this | reply

AlPenwasser

nerd

What are the Spanish Steps?

posted by brisbane_artist on October 22, 2005 at 12:48 PM | link to this | reply

Here is one of my photos

posted by realitytherapy on October 22, 2005 at 12:40 PM | link to this | reply

AL
Sometimes these things are hereditary LOL

posted by realitytherapy on October 21, 2005 at 11:26 PM | link to this | reply

Reality
My "masterpiece" (such as it was) was when I did a "Where's Waldo" type shot with my kids and I on the Spanish Steps.  I think my wife tolerates me, but I think she's concerned that the kids like to do these kind of things, too!

posted by AlPenwasser on October 21, 2005 at 8:32 PM | link to this | reply

Jo
Oh yeah they said it... no big deal though I just enjoy getting out and taking pictures.  LOL

posted by realitytherapy on October 21, 2005 at 1:07 PM | link to this | reply

I can't believe

someone would say that.

Jo

posted by brisbane_artist on October 21, 2005 at 12:56 PM | link to this | reply

Mike

I will let you know when I do my casting call LOL!

posted by realitytherapy on October 21, 2005 at 9:28 AM | link to this | reply

AL
I love the "where's waldo" genre. I think it is hysterical.

posted by realitytherapy on October 21, 2005 at 9:27 AM | link to this | reply

I am a huge fan of the personless/bodyless photograph and/or painting.
And I do not believe that make's you a cheap artist.  I believe that it makes you a person who doesn't wish to cheapen their art.  I liken people who always have to have some dumbass standing uncomfortably in a photo or some contrived scene to bucolic landscape painters who always have to have a damned barn or a nearly collapsed old shed somewhere in the picture.  Totally unnecessary.  Pictures, paintings, photos, lithos, engravings, sketches, and all do not have to have a human element (that includes man-made objects) to be artistic.   People in photos are overrated.  Hell, for that matter, people are overrated.

posted by saul_relative on October 21, 2005 at 9:17 AM | link to this | reply

I am an extremely cheap model
I will be glad to work with you.  However, I am a notorious prima donna.

posted by mikebrown on October 21, 2005 at 9:05 AM | link to this | reply

Pretty Cool!

My wife never likes me to take landscape pictures-she ALWAYS wants people. While I also enjoy having people in my photos, I'm with you.  People can be a pain in the ass (geez, will they EVER stop the "ole-put-fake-horns-behind-someone's-head-because-it's-a-scream" routine?).  For instance, my cousin always likes to flip the bird to the photographer (usually down the side of his pants, so it's not TOO obvious).  What I've done with several of my photos is, somewhere off to the side, I'm tying my shoe.  So, while you have this great picture of the Eiffel Tower, for example, if you look closely, I'm hovering over my shoe. I've taken a lot of pictures in this "Where's Waldo" motif: the Eifeel Tower, Masada, Independence Hall, St. Peter's, Venice, etc. When my wife complains about the landscape, I point out that I am actually in the photo.  She's rarely amused.

Great post!

posted by AlPenwasser on October 21, 2005 at 8:10 AM | link to this | reply