Go to I WRITE, THEREFORE I AM
- Add a comment
- Go to Is the flaw in Blogit's system fixable? The truth lies behind the clicks!
wodsmith, I'd love to know that as well.
posted by
Julia.
on July 20, 2004 at 4:45 PM
| link to this | reply
It would be interesting to know who
reads my stuff other than those who reads comments, that's for sure.
posted by
word.smith
on July 20, 2004 at 2:40 PM
| link to this | reply
Thank you E-Shock!
posted by
Julia.
on July 19, 2004 at 9:49 AM
| link to this | reply
I am for it Qurikster
u so rock;)
posted by
EccentricShock
on July 18, 2004 at 3:44 PM
| link to this | reply
It will be a long time till that is possible, although it sounds like a
great idea!
posted by
Runs_at_dawn
on July 16, 2004 at 8:23 AM
| link to this | reply
Quirky,
Nope, gonna wait and try to keep low until after the other subscription expires so I can maybe go back to myddrin alone and keep my posts intact. Anyway, I'm taking down the computer tommorrow and no sense in trying to be sensational until I get back on-line. shadow
posted by
myddrin15
on July 15, 2004 at 10:28 AM
| link to this | reply
QuirkyAlone
You have a good point here, yeah, I'd like this Blogit thingy to be more honest
posted by
WileyJohn
on July 15, 2004 at 10:24 AM
| link to this | reply
Shadow, LOL...now go post something new to that brand new you!!
posted by
Julia.
on July 15, 2004 at 10:21 AM
| link to this | reply
Quirky,
Well I have nothing to hide. Heck, I even announced my name change so that I wouldn't be considered suspicious. shadow
posted by
myddrin15
on July 15, 2004 at 10:03 AM
| link to this | reply
Kay, I would love to see distribution lists made public whether
someone chose to post theirs or not. It would be quite revealing I'm sure. I imagine most bloggers would howl bloody murder about having theirs be public record, though. I would also like to see who is clicking whom on a daily basis regardless of whether they leave comments, esp. the blogger(s) who have many non-active accounts.
posted by
Julia.
on July 15, 2004 at 9:53 AM
| link to this | reply
I try to leave comments
as it happens sometimes it may be just Good Post. Other times I find that what I have clinked on isnt worth reading and I move on. Keep Writing and Smiling
posted by
StrickGold
on July 14, 2004 at 10:59 PM
| link to this | reply
So if Blogit makes all our reading distribution lists visible then that will fix it?
posted by
Kay-Ren
on July 14, 2004 at 10:07 PM
| link to this | reply
It would be nice to know who is behind the invisible clicks.
Besides, it would be nice to who is reading you even if they didn't comment. Oh, well. I don't
always comment on blogs if I really don't have anything to say about it (not to say whether it's good or bad.) I also don't comment on blogs just to get a reciprical click on one of mine.
posted by
SpitFire70
on July 14, 2004 at 10:06 PM
| link to this | reply
lol
Carpel Tunnel? Too bad. I like to click on my own thing. 
But no... our "self-clicks" don't count.
LoL. Blogit Brian. Come on, Blogit Brian... don't be shy... help fix the bad system! 
posted by
helene
on July 14, 2004 at 8:30 PM
| link to this | reply
rachelAnna, clicks to yourself don't get you anything
except a sore wrist and carpel tunnel syndrome.
posted by
Julia.
on July 14, 2004 at 7:53 PM
| link to this | reply
Dan, so sorry, in my next post I will give you credit for
inventing that wonderful term. And that's a promise!
posted by
Julia.
on July 14, 2004 at 7:49 PM
| link to this | reply
As far as ratings go though,
isn't a click a click? Put aside how much you profit from each, each time your clicked doesn't that count? So what keeps people from just clicking their own way to the #1 spot? Or do your own clicks not count? Sure, the person wouldn't earn much, but you've got to wonder if people haven't done that in the past.
posted by
RachelAnna
on July 14, 2004 at 5:24 PM
| link to this | reply
Not all clicks are created equal.
Thing is though, that it is NOT just clicks. Let's say ccnews reads 100 blogs a month, I read 600 and Ariala reads 2000. (These are hypothetical, yet in line with past amounts we have each posted)
One click from ccnews might be the same *percentage* of his overall reads as six clicks from me, or even 20 clicks from Ariala, so you would earn MORE by getting him to read than you do either me or Ariala.
But your rankings are based on total clicks.
So - if ccnews clicked on you 20x, I clicked on Wiley 20x and Ariala clicked on Beachbelle 20x - you each got the SAME # of clicks, but you would make more money for the same amount of reads than either Wiley or BB, because one click from ccnews is a greater percentage of his overall reads.
posted by
Tamara99
on July 14, 2004 at 4:41 PM
| link to this | reply
For a "screenwiter" you are flaky
I bet you believe in the black chopper theory, you should sign yourself in or double up on the meds.
posted by
scoop
on July 14, 2004 at 4:39 PM
| link to this | reply
I want to know who, beside me, and that other person, clicks me.
posted by
scriber
on July 14, 2004 at 4:15 PM
| link to this | reply
Yeah! And you smell, too!!!
posted by
mark2556
on July 14, 2004 at 3:59 PM
| link to this | reply
Mmmmmmmmmm....................shadow
posted by
myddrin15
on July 14, 2004 at 3:10 PM
| link to this | reply
This is pure bullshat. Look where this blog is in the rankings to prove it's own hypocrisy. I have made a comment on sassy's blog to outline my case on Blogit. I invented the expression 'poor hapless newbie' which you have appropriated and brazenly taken advantage of to obtain clicks. Your argument sucks.
posted by
TomHunks
on July 14, 2004 at 2:33 PM
| link to this | reply