Go to The Reverend Kooka Speaks About Religious Bulls#!t
- Add a comment
- Go to I guess the battle is on, once more
A classic use of fallacious logic
This challenge to disprove God is a classic example of the Burden of Proof fallacy. Your detractors have fallen prey to faulty logic. See my "Are you being duped?'' blog for several other examples.
posted by
aardvark
on March 10, 2004 at 5:25 PM
| link to this | reply
Jemmie211
I agree, that is why when the challenge was made I replied back by saying that he would have to defend his views using the same logic I defend mine with. You will notice we have yet to see any of the Christians come forward with their side of the issue and using the same rules as I use.
This is what happened last time a Christian here decided to make such a challenge. She declared herself the winner before anyone else got a chance to give their two cents worth and then when everyone said 'play by the same rules as us' she backed down and tired to play the victim.
posted by
kooka_lives
on March 10, 2004 at 4:48 PM
| link to this | reply
She just hasnt found him yet...lol
posted by
Moonwind
on March 10, 2004 at 4:42 PM
| link to this | reply
Why do you have to prove scientifically that there is no God? Why can't they prove scientifically that there
is a God? Noooooooooooooo...they hide behind the faith argument: "I have faith He exists." Well, can't you counter that by saying, "I have faith he doesn't exist."?
posted by
Jemmie211
on March 10, 2004 at 4:40 PM
| link to this | reply
Beam me up Scotty..
Im in a heap of trouble!!!!
posted by
mozzie
on March 10, 2004 at 4:42 AM
| link to this | reply