AOL managers knew advertising revenue was weak but hoped to replace it
Senior AOL executives are acknowledging to the New York Times that by spring of 2001, AOL's top management knew that a significant part of the company's advertising revenue was in jeopardy:
But the company did not disclose the danger, they said, because its top executives bet that the company could replace lost revenue with new revenue from companywide corporate advertising deals tied to Time Warner magazines and television networks. After five years of explosive growth in a fast-changing business, Mr. Pittman and other top officers were confident they could keep it up, several senior executives said.
...Several other deals now under new scrutiny were sales of advertising to companies that AOL was simultaneously paying for something else, a habit Mr. Pittman defended at the time as good business. "Maybe we don't have a vendor who is giving us the lowest price," Mr. Pittman once explained to Advertising Age, "but maybe we have a vendor who is giving us the lowest price when you add it to how much they are spending on advertising."
Some of these deals are now under investigation because they created the potential for AOL to overpay in order to get money back as profitable advertising revenue, a practice sometimes known as roundtripping.