Go to Old News (The Unbearable Lightness Of Blogging)
- Add a comment
- Go to My Review of Spiderman 3
You should, A + B. It's really pretty good, actually.
Despite the strong implication of this review.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 5, 2007 at 4:14 PM
| link to this | reply
We plan to go in the next weekend or so.
posted by
A-and-B
on May 5, 2007 at 3:03 PM
| link to this | reply
It is, Scriber.
While Part 1 is very good, Part 2 is a
masterpiece (imo).
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 9:43 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: Oh, that reminds me, Scriber ...Is 2 better than 1? I haven't seen one,
but saw just about all of two.
posted by
scriber
on May 4, 2007 at 2:35 PM
| link to this | reply
Oh, that reminds me, Scriber ...
Spiderman 2 is actually on FX tonight at 8 PM (EST).
I would strongly recommend everyone (who hasn't seen it) watch it. If at all humanly possible.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 2:29 PM
| link to this | reply
As I said in the review, bandana, they just seemed to be trying a whole bunch of new things (possibly to avoid comparison to the previous one).
Probably too many new things, as it were.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 2:27 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: Yes. He showed a lot of acting ability on SNL. I'll probably watch
his new movie when it hits TV. The others are playing now on Cable.
posted by
scriber
on May 4, 2007 at 2:23 PM
| link to this | reply
Is Spiderman3 supposed to be a comedy?
Then why did that ugly-duckling Dunst sing?
posted by
bandanafish
on May 4, 2007 at 2:13 PM
| link to this | reply
Yeah, he was funny on SNL, Scriber.
Particularly when he was playing "Screech" (from "Saved by the Bell").
However, Peter Parker is not supposed to be physically imposing, actually. Unlike, say, Clark Kent or Bruce Wayne, Parker is just a regular old loser in "real life".
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 10:49 AM
| link to this | reply
Mzele--nice review...The Star
still looks kind of small and thin on some guest shows. Amazing what special effects can do.
Good actor, for sure. I saw him on Sat. Nite Live and he was really funny.
posted by
scriber
on May 4, 2007 at 10:34 AM
| link to this | reply
Short answer, riri0322:
Yes.
(Though you should still read the review, anyway.)
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 10:15 AM
| link to this | reply
Well, it won't make much difference at this point, Robdon.
So it's probably safe for me to read it now.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 10:14 AM
| link to this | reply
Typo alert!
Um, that should say "thank
s",
obviously.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 10:13 AM
| link to this | reply
Thank for dropping by, afzal50.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 10:12 AM
| link to this | reply
Unfortunately, I wasn't, REFLECTIONOFME_223_30
I didn't get home until 4:30 AM, so I figured I might as well wait to post.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 10:11 AM
| link to this | reply
I think it's something sexual, food4thought.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 4, 2007 at 10:10 AM
| link to this | reply
was it worth the price of admission?
posted by
riri0322
on May 4, 2007 at 7:55 AM
| link to this | reply
well don't read my review.. I give away the whole thing!!!!
posted by
robdon67
on May 4, 2007 at 3:53 AM
| link to this | reply
posted by
afzal50
on May 4, 2007 at 12:59 AM
| link to this | reply
HAVE FUN
I WILL STILL BE WOKE
posted by
Charnell_Lanay
on May 3, 2007 at 10:14 PM
| link to this | reply
My Spidey senses are tingling...
Whatever that means.
posted by
food4thought
on May 3, 2007 at 9:00 PM
| link to this | reply
So, like, you mean...
I'm a Dummy?! Well, I do enjoy
simple life, if you know what I mean.
p.s. replied (and then some!)
p.p.s. Okay, I will. 
posted by
bandanafish
on May 3, 2007 at 8:12 PM
| link to this | reply
That's cause you're so dumb, T.
P.S. 
P.P.S. You can read "Flowers on Their Bridles, Hooves in the Air" while you wait up for me.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 3, 2007 at 8:03 PM
| link to this | reply
Hm, I left out a "how"...
posted by
bandanafish
on May 3, 2007 at 8:00 PM
| link to this | reply
I do I know?
Because I
carefully guessed. I just don't see the whole hype, that's all.
posted by
bandanafish
on May 3, 2007 at 7:59 PM
| link to this | reply
You should definitely see Part 2, Shelly.
It's absolutely brilliant and not just in a "comic book movie sort of way".
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 3, 2007 at 7:56 PM
| link to this | reply
Well, I guess I should see 1 and 2 first, eh? LOL
posted by
shelly_b
on May 3, 2007 at 7:55 PM
| link to this | reply
Typo alert!
The possessive of "who" is
whose.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 3, 2007 at 7:55 PM
| link to this | reply
How do you know, bandana?
Have you seen it?
Besides, who's even rated it yet?
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 3, 2007 at 7:54 PM
| link to this | reply
Hopefully it will be, star4you.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 3, 2007 at 7:53 PM
| link to this | reply
Spiderman 3-- overrated.
posted by
bandanafish
on May 3, 2007 at 7:53 PM
| link to this | reply
cool........cool.....cool
posted by
star4sky5
on May 3, 2007 at 7:43 PM
| link to this | reply
I have mixed feelings, actually, Whacky ...
On the one hand, I'm really looking forward to it (because I so loved Part 2).
However, for some reason, my spider sense is tingling.
posted by
Mademoiselle
on May 3, 2007 at 7:21 PM
| link to this | reply
Spidey 3! all ready? I just can't wait! Well I guess I'll have to!
A smile
from me and a WOOF!and
smile from Bo! =^..^=
posted by
Whacky
on May 3, 2007 at 7:13 PM
| link to this | reply