Comments on You Can Always Burn The Books

Go to What Country Am I In?Add a commentGo to You Can Always Burn The Books

Even books as terrible and reprehensible as "The Turner Diaries" should
not be put to the torch, simply because they can be used as teaching tools.  We can even learn from Fred Barnes Rebel-In-Chief, another propagandistic and overly slanted piece of crap that proves only that extreme ideology is alive and well -- and printable in the United States.  No, books should only be burned by accidental fires.  The intentional burning of books is a crime against tolerance, intelligence, and humanity. 

posted by saul_relative on May 20, 2006 at 9:09 AM | link to this | reply

If there's a book out there, or a series of books that we dont like...
we dont have to read them, pure and simple...but burn/destroy them?? How many times has that been done in our history?  A few.  Think we'd learn....

posted by Rumor on May 20, 2006 at 4:45 AM | link to this | reply

Thanks, star4you. I think?

posted by saul_relative on May 19, 2006 at 6:45 PM | link to this | reply

that's so cool

posted by star4sky5 on May 19, 2006 at 6:38 PM | link to this | reply

But flames from burning books are soooo pretty, Renigade...

posted by saul_relative on May 19, 2006 at 6:16 PM | link to this | reply

Obviously she isn't secure in her own beliefs. It reminds me of the stink
over The DaVinci Code.  While I am Catholic, I can't imagine what the big deal is.  Fiction is fiction.  And even if Dan Brown wrote it as non-fiction, I still wouldn't be concerned.  Fascinated, but not concerned--and definitely not threatened enough to burn a book.

posted by Renigade on May 19, 2006 at 5:13 PM | link to this | reply

Thanks, TallandSkinnyPoet. I appreciate the compliment. I strive to find
an interesting topic, even a slight bent on an old topic.  And you're right; as an act of contrition, I will strive harder to convert, rather than alienate.  Sometimes my frustration gets the better of me...

posted by saul_relative on May 17, 2006 at 4:10 PM | link to this | reply

Got A Lot of This While I Taught 5th Grade
...and I think some people are just insecure in general, that's why they clinge to a solid thing they know - their religion - so tightly.  Don't know if you're going to convert anybody to our side with the descriptive language you use (isn't converting some people the point, after all?), but your view is well-taken anyway.  You are the master at finding great topics...  --Shawn "Tall and Skinny Poet"

posted by TallAndSkinnyPoet on May 16, 2006 at 10:01 PM | link to this | reply

And are more than welcome to voice it in my America, Mr. Dallas.
Nothing more democratic...

posted by saul_relative on May 14, 2006 at 9:05 PM | link to this | reply

No offense taken....
I just have a different perspectve on it.........

posted by Corbin_Dallas on May 14, 2006 at 2:44 PM | link to this | reply

My entire family is made up of Christians, Corbin, on both sides. Some
are fairly well educated, some not so much.  And quite a few of them fit the description of those people I was talking about.  That "sweeping generality" was aimed at all the "backward-assed, close-minded Christians like Laura Mallory", and there are oh so many Christians "like Laura Mallory" that I believe it not to be so general, but rather specific.  There's no reason to be defensive or offended if you are not "like Laura Mallory."

posted by saul_relative on May 14, 2006 at 9:36 AM | link to this | reply

It's so easy to speak about Christians.....

with such sweeping generalities, isn't it? 

I am a Christian....I try not to get into discussions about it because it's my personal choice.  However, in this topic, I have to point it out a bit of a misconception. 

Why? 

I am a Christian and think that the idiotic demands of this woman are terrible.  Burn books?   Nope, not for me, and I can say that the Christians that are among my friends and family feel the same way.  This is a crazy fanatic that does not represent Christians as a whole.   Yet many choose to use her as typical Christian.......how insulting.  It's like saying  Louis Farrikan is representative of all blacks, or Michael Morre is your average Democrat.

It's just like the uproar over the Da Vinci Code.  So what, it's a work of fiction, I bought it and enjoyed reading it, even bought the sequel.  Written along the lines of many great spy novels.   Did I feel threatenedd by it?  Nope, why should I?  I am comfortable with the relationship I have with my Lord.  When you make something like this a newsworthy issue...you give it free attention.

JMHO

posted by Corbin_Dallas on May 14, 2006 at 6:03 AM | link to this | reply

The idea of a government dumbing down its people seems horrible, and yet,
Azur, the Bush administration and the radical right are doing a fine job of it, here in the land of opportunity and enlightenment.

posted by saul_relative on May 13, 2006 at 5:48 PM | link to this | reply

Getting stranger as the millenium grows older, the old one recedes, MG,
as if Christians are afraid, even frantic, that their Second Coming may not happen.

posted by saul_relative on May 13, 2006 at 5:45 PM | link to this | reply

I don't like the nanny state mentality where thinking is discouraged
resourcefulness is entirely discouraged

posted by Azur on May 13, 2006 at 5:43 PM | link to this | reply

..strange world that we live in....

posted by MasonGarrett on May 13, 2006 at 5:38 PM | link to this | reply

Thanks, Frankenkitty. Most people who follow some type of religious
doctrine are way imposing.  (The Jehovah Witness line was excellent, by the way.)  The thing that pissed me off the most about this Mallory woman is that she judged a set of books by their covers and didn't bother to even read them, a case of judge ye most that which ye know nothing. 

posted by saul_relative on May 13, 2006 at 5:29 PM | link to this | reply

I always found Christianity rather
chauvinistic.  I told that to a Jehovah's Witness and he about had a heart attack.  He made his wife go sit in the car so she would not be exposed to me.  I guess this Mallory lady thinks she can make decisions for other mothers without asking them their opinions or belief systems.  Sounds very totalitarian to me.  Ah, the seeds of oppression.  Great post

posted by Flumpystalls3000 on May 13, 2006 at 4:23 PM | link to this | reply