Go to The Armed Citizen- Imperative Justice In Action
- Add a comment
- Go to Castle Doctrine Cases in Pennsylvania
Naut
That is good, but in Canada, such reasonable force will not likely include a gun. You gun restrictions are pretty severe, I think. Better keep a baseball bat handy, LOL. Not to disparage bats, no indeed, I would rather have a bat than anything else, if I didn't have a gun. 
posted by
GoldenMean
on July 16, 2016 at 4:20 PM
| link to this | reply
GM
In Canada we don't have a 'castle doctrine' as such, but we are allowed to use 'reasonable and necessary' force to resist entry to someone with felonious intent...
posted by
Nautikos
on July 15, 2016 at 7:11 AM
| link to this | reply
It will be interesting to see what, if anything, develops from this case. The Castle Doctrine does make sense to me.
posted by
FormerStudentIntern
on July 13, 2016 at 6:24 AM
| link to this | reply