Comments on (No subject)

Go to Sea Gypsy PoetryAdd a commentGo to (No subject)

Re: Re: Re: Re:C_C_T Presta

So true!

posted by Katray2 on February 9, 2016 at 9:53 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Re: Re:C_C_T Presta

Ahh, C_C_T, it  only means that when you said "...not criticizing..." I wasn't offended.

For All

I find the people on this site to be ever so gentle, kind, caring and non-critical. For many years I had never posted anything anywhere because of negative and even cruel comments I had read on other sites. A great group here! 

RP

 

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 9, 2016 at 9:41 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Re:C_C_T Presta

Yes a very gentle reply, but what does it mean ?

posted by C_C_T on February 9, 2016 at 7:45 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Re: Kabu

and I really enjoyed this version.

posted by Kabu on February 8, 2016 at 5:10 PM | link to this | reply

Re: Kabu

Glad you liked it! A spirit is a spirit! In this version, the "Angel" is only in his imagination, not quite real; thus, she disappears as he reaches out to her! The gown diaphenous seemed appropriate. :) In another version, she is real; not an Angel, and still, the gown diaphenous seems appropriate! Thank you so much.

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 1:36 PM | link to this | reply

Re:C_C_T

Thank you, no offense taken. 

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 1:30 PM | link to this | reply

Loved it dear and I love the thought of diaphenous gowns for there is no sex in heaven An angel can just be a being  a spirit.

Image result for spirit angels

 

posted by Kabu on February 8, 2016 at 11:21 AM | link to this | reply

Only pointing to it in case you want to publish .Not critizing .'malificient' a good word for a devil.

posted by C_C_T on February 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Nautikos

Thanks. Better in a diaphenous gown than a nun's habit, and since it was only a vision in this version...and, yes, there are two versions, neither of which would support an Angel in a nun's habit! LOL! Yes, I figured 'Evening' to be as you intended. Quite good, that one. 

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 10:27 AM | link to this | reply

Re: BC-A

Indeed, love! I smile.

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 10:21 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Katray2

Thanks so much, a nice compliment from you, it is!

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 10:20 AM | link to this | reply

Re: C_C_T

Sorry about the word, which one was it? 

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 10:19 AM | link to this | reply

Re: FSI

Rich and intense, thank you!

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM | link to this | reply

Re:Grandpa3

Thank you.

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM | link to this | reply

Re:

posted by Sea_Gypsy on February 8, 2016 at 10:17 AM | link to this | reply

Indeed, only love love.

posted by BC-A on February 8, 2016 at 9:56 AM | link to this | reply

Very well done!

I enjoy a darker edge.

posted by Katray2 on February 8, 2016 at 9:00 AM | link to this | reply

 It is probably what an Angel would do. I think this is quite good writing. One word I could not understand, but it might be American, sometimes they are not listed in the Oxford Dictionary. Well I could understand what it signified. I am dyslexic somewhat.  

posted by C_C_T on February 8, 2016 at 7:39 AM | link to this | reply

RP

Nice! I just wish Angels wouldn't always appear in diaphenous gowns - it induces unholy thoughts, LOL...Oh, and your second comment to 'Evening' had the intended interpretation...

posted by Nautikos on February 8, 2016 at 5:59 AM | link to this | reply

Your poem is rich with intense imagery.

posted by FormerStudentIntern on February 8, 2016 at 5:24 AM | link to this | reply

Very nice wording with a lot of imagery

Well done!

posted by Grandpa3 on February 8, 2016 at 4:36 AM | link to this | reply