Go to From The Observation Deck
- Add a comment
- Go to No interest in helping your case? This is the way to do it!
Re: Re: Re: Jimmy
Oh, I understand the distinction completely, Naut. I'm very well-read on WW II and on Germany in general from 1925-1945. And because of that, not only do I know and understand the difference between a "regular army" uniform and a Gestapo or SS uniform, but I can also readily recognize a German soldier's uniform . . . any uniform . . . from that era. And as far as I'm concerned, anyone who donned the uniform of any branch of the German military at that time was under Hitler's "spell," and had allegiance, in one form or another, to his regime. So now the fact that this gentleman chooses to walk around town wearing the jacket of a German uniform from that era tells me he probably still has some deep, unresolved feelings towards the defeat of his "Father Land." Those particular puzzle pieces are not that difficult to put together . . . 
posted by
JimmyA
on June 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: Re: Jimmy
I'm not sure why he would wear that. But I do make a distinction between a German army uniform and a Nazi uniform, which was really different in colour and design. The Nazi uniforms (SS, SA, etc.,) usually included the swastika armband as well. Even the SS had different uniforms: there was the Black SS, the ones who were involved in the concentration camps, and the Waffen SS, (Armed SS) who were elite units, hand-picked but not necessarily volunteers and committed Nazis...
posted by
Nautikos
on June 14, 2013 at 10:50 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: Jimmy
I don't think anyone would, Naut. Believe it or not, we actually have an elderly gentleman who occasionally parades around our town sporting an old jacket from a WW II German uniform. I can only imagine that it would be similar to someone wearing a jersey to support their local sports team! If I put on a Giant's jersey, I'm basically saying I root for and support the Giants. What do you suppose he's saying by wearing that jacket . . .? 
posted by
JimmyA
on June 14, 2013 at 7:22 AM
| link to this | reply
Jimmy
This guy is probably mentally rather unstable in the first place - nobody in his right mind parades around in a Nazi uniform (actually, if you do that in Germany, you get jailed!) - so I have no problem with having his kids removed from his influence...
posted by
Nautikos
on June 14, 2013 at 6:53 AM
| link to this | reply
Re:
I would think, TAPS, that whether we are judging a book by its cover or not probably doesn't matter in this particular case. He is making his feelings and beliefs quite obvious to everyone, and donning an outfit that screams hatred can only have a negative impact on those around him. The "spirit of rebellion" may be an understatement, as far as this person is concerned . . . 
posted by
JimmyA
on June 14, 2013 at 5:21 AM
| link to this | reply
I'm afraid that what is on the outside might turn me off before I ever got to know the inside. He definitely has a spirit of rebellion, which in itself is against God's teachings in the Bible (which doesn't seem to concern an awful lot of people).
posted by
TAPS.
on June 13, 2013 at 7:06 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: This is the way to do it!
That, MsJudy, is probably the general consensus. Whether or not the boys would ever desire to grow up to be just like dad, at the very least ( or worst ) they may become desensitized to the evils associated with Nazism, and the ideals of "right & wrong" will be forever compromised! I'll have to pay attention to the outcome of this case! I just can't see it going his way . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 1:24 PM
| link to this | reply
Re:
Of course you're right, Utah. Anyone who admires or emulates someone along the lines of Hitler, or Stalin, or Charles Manson, or Jim Jones, or Idi Amin, or whoever, is not only confused, but probably potentially dangerous! Definitely too much hatred in that household for young children to be exposed to . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 1:17 PM
| link to this | reply
Re:
You're probably right, mariss. Although the whole bookcover/judging scenario may be subjective, that was a bold, and obvious, move on his part to show his true feelings. Not a very good environment to raise small children in, to say the least . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 1:07 PM
| link to this | reply
This is the way to do it!
We are role modles for our children, a little boy wants to be just like Daddy when he grows up! So my oppinion is that this man should have no contact with his children!
posted by
MsJudy
on June 13, 2013 at 12:34 PM
| link to this | reply
The man is confused at best, and his hate is apparent in his apparel and tattoos...One life lost in hate is enough.
posted by
UtahJay
on June 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM
| link to this | reply
His outward appearance has to reflect some of what is inside for him to be so brazen and showy. The various reasons he lost his kids are probably related to his appearance and legitimate reasons to not be in charge of small children. I would not consider him fit to raise children when he displays himself as a dedicated Nazi. He may not even be able to have the income to support them and is probably abusive with more than the "look".
posted by
mariss9
on June 13, 2013 at 8:04 AM
| link to this | reply
Re:
Absolutely not, lion! I suppose it would be like someone applying for a job at an animal rescue shelter wearing a chef's hat and an apron which reads "I'll kill and eat anything!" Their application would probably be shredded right in front of them . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:45 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: JimmyA
Does such a thing exist, Sir Wiley? If so, I'm sure they would be glad to have him! Probably after a year or so, he would be more than willing to come back and change his kid's name to Harry or George or Sam or something! And I think it may be time to hang up that Nazi uniform too! By the way, were there ever any Nazi's who weren't nasty . . . ? 
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:40 AM
| link to this | reply
Re:
Absolutely not, Kabu! And don't worry . . . I believe that "nutcase" was probably a fairly good, and fairly accurate, description! Personally, I don't think he or his case stands a snowball's chance . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:35 AM
| link to this | reply
Re:
It does indeed, Annicita, but look at it this way. I don't know if you're a poker player or not, but there's an expression that comes from it where someone unintentionally "tips their hand," accidentally revealing the cards they are holding. Suppose he had shown up in court in an everyday suit & tie. He may have actually fooled the judge into thinking he was a sane, rational man and father. But this way, he "tipped his hand" and revealed his true self! In his own, stupid way, I think he made the court's decision somewhat easier . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:32 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: I find the whole thing disturbing
Well that, Mia, is the natural, common sense approach that many others will probably feel as well. We all obviously know how impressionable little children are, and if they are taught these beliefs and ideals, presented as "normal," who knows what those kids will grow up to be or act like! I personally don't think he stands a chance . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:27 AM
| link to this | reply
Re:
I suppose, FSI, we'll just all have to wait and see. I know there will probably be a few "free speech" and "civil liberties" advocates who may actually support him and his right to wear what he wants, practice what he wants, and raise his children however he wants! But let's just hope that common sense rules the day . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:22 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: Jimmy...
Well, Rumor, I suppose there's his proper Gestapo gear, followed by his weekend Stormtrooper ensamble. And then on Sundays, it's formal SS black attire! All spit and polish, that's what the ol' boy requires! More than meets the eye indeed! It's 2013, for Pete's sake . . . !
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:19 AM
| link to this | reply
Re:
Oh there is, lustor! And protective services took his kids long before anyone saw him in a Nazi uniform! I think plenty of red flags were raised after he named one of his poor kids Adolph Hitler! Who knows what kind of environment the little ones were growing up in . . .
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:16 AM
| link to this | reply
Re:
That's probably true, C C T. At least then, there might be a chance of people regarding him as a "fun" dad as opposed to a "rascist" dad!
posted by
JimmyA
on June 13, 2013 at 5:13 AM
| link to this | reply
I think that when trying to convince a court of your capacity for love and ability to nurture young minds then perhaps the uniform of a group known for hatred isn't a very intelligent move.
posted by
lionreign
on June 13, 2013 at 3:46 AM
| link to this | reply
JimmyA
Send him to Israel for a few years, boot camp for nasty Nazi's.LOL
posted by
WileyJohn
on June 12, 2013 at 8:41 PM
| link to this | reply
He reads like a nutcase.....er um rather an unstable individual to me....Not the influence one wants for the next generation.
posted by
Kabu
on June 12, 2013 at 4:34 PM
| link to this | reply
he needs a big thump up the side of his head and someone saying what were you thinking?
sure we shouldn't judge a book by its cover but we are talking about him emulating a man that caused WWII and hatred of the jews, catholics anybody not full blooded aryan and nonjew...which come to think of it...hitler wouldn't even have qualified if someone else had been in power!
to say that you are a good father....well how can dressing like one of the most hated men in history not to mention tattooing the swatiska on your neck...I think as the others do there is a lot more than what meets the eye.
something wicked this way comes.....
posted by
Annicita
on June 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM
| link to this | reply
I find the whole thing disturbing
If he's such a big fan of Hitler, does this mean he supports the Nazi regime and parrots their beliefs around the house? Are those the values he's teaching his children?
If so, I'm not sure it's advisable to let him raise children...this is just my opinion, but I don't think any child should grow up in a household where hatred is the prevalent lesson.
posted by
Mia890
on June 12, 2013 at 10:20 AM
| link to this | reply
Words cannot describe how goofy that guy is...I wonder what the court will end up deciding.
posted by
FormerStudentIntern
on June 12, 2013 at 9:32 AM
| link to this | reply
Jimmy...
There's more than meets the eye here...I wonder how this guy dresses for business meetings, or "whatever"??....
posted by
Rumor
on June 12, 2013 at 8:51 AM
| link to this | reply
there must be more to the story then just what he wears for protective services to take all his kids
posted by
Lanetay
on June 12, 2013 at 8:44 AM
| link to this | reply
Well he isn't helping his case he would be better dressed as a gorilla it might raise a laugh.
posted by
C_C_T
on June 12, 2013 at 8:35 AM
| link to this | reply