Go to Bill's Parker
- Add a comment
- Go to Do phases of construction improve major parks or are historic designs good?
I think the history is most important, if it has stood all these years????
posted by
UtahJay
on June 12, 2013 at 7:49 AM
| link to this | reply
BC-A
Modern building materials are superior to most things from the past...
posted by
WileyJohn
on June 11, 2013 at 7:27 PM
| link to this | reply
I suppose sometimes species develop undesirable traits and it may not be seen by the casual observer. It does need experienced workers to work within the historical pattern which many enjoy.
posted by
C_C_T
on June 11, 2013 at 11:49 AM
| link to this | reply
I love history Bill.
posted by
Kabu
on June 11, 2013 at 11:26 AM
| link to this | reply
DC
I say that the historic is good for today.
posted by
FormerStudentIntern
on June 11, 2013 at 9:44 AM
| link to this | reply
BC
I prefer the historic designs, and they should definitely not remove established trees! 
posted by
Nautikos
on June 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM
| link to this | reply
I don't really have an answer to your questions, but I am, and always have been, very appreciative of how well Kansas City Park Department keeps up the parks and the fountains, and is always improving one or the other of them. I never have any complaints about the large park area close to our house except for an over-abundance of Canada geese and their excessive poop.
posted by
TAPS.
on June 11, 2013 at 9:11 AM
| link to this | reply