Go to Naut's Thoughts
- Add a comment
- Go to It’s About Time…Part V
Well one cannot just breeze through this and consolidate the result . I used to be told that one should not try to think how the universe could end because it does not. It is I suppose because we see end to everything and we measure it with our own conception of
decay. Wow it makes my minds ache Naut. I could just polish off some fish and chips,
posted by
C_C_T
on April 25, 2012 at 12:04 AM
| link to this | reply
I think it's probably just a puzzle given to stump us and God is getting a big kick out of our attempts to solve it.
posted by
TAPS.
on April 24, 2012 at 7:57 PM
| link to this | reply
Naut, you are correct that...
eternity / constant / Being cannot be termed as "dimension", since dimension is something that is measurable. It is the "reference" against which the 4 dimensions are measured, and when viewed from that perspective, time loses the significance we earthlings attach to it.
posted by
ash_pradhan
on April 24, 2012 at 6:29 PM
| link to this | reply
I think my head is spinning....
posted by
Bel_Marshall
on April 24, 2012 at 6:11 PM
| link to this | reply
If I could grasp Eternity, I would possibly understand the philosophical
view of Time as you seem to be leading us towards.
posted by
Kabu
on April 24, 2012 at 3:28 PM
| link to this | reply
I'm confused.
Also, nobody has ever accused me of thinking "normal." I love this discussion, though. All these facets in your posits as well as the comments. I'm coming back to read this again.
posted by
Pat_B
on April 24, 2012 at 12:24 PM
| link to this | reply