Comments on So San Francisco Has Passed A Law Banning Happy Meals?

Go to If I get smart with you....how will you know?Add a commentGo to So San Francisco Has Passed A Law Banning Happy Meals?

I totally agree with you here!!

posted by adnohr on November 5, 2010 at 9:17 PM | link to this | reply

Corbin
Even though I am one of those for whom any meal at MacD's would be an Unhappy Meal, I am appalled at this intrusion of the state into our lives! It almost makes me want to go and buy a Giant Quadruple Whopper with Extra Bacon & Cheese on a 2lb Bed of Fries slathered in Gravy and Cheese, a la Poutine...

posted by Nautikos on November 5, 2010 at 5:53 AM | link to this | reply

j ü Happy Meals are in small portions. The Angus ones remain. The framers of the Constitution would be concerned about this. Apparently they would give people freedom to choose their portion according to their dietary needs and appetite. People must have had the right originally to eat until they’re filled or overeat at their own risk if they choose. Have it your way! BC-A, Bill’s R®st

posted by BC-A on November 5, 2010 at 5:23 AM | link to this | reply