Go to Keeping America Great 4 More Years!
- Add a comment
- Go to Chicago Mayor Daley To Beg World Court To Overturn Our 2nd Amendment?
You win the Blogit Award for most unrelated comments on one post.......
Nothing you have said has anything to do with the topic.......pathetic!
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on May 2, 2010 at 3:25 AM
| link to this | reply
Actually, I see where you and the NRA support
the killing of people with guns.
You don't want the rights of people to carry guns abridged -- and that has to include those who murder other people with guns -- drive by shootings, etc.
that's how I read what you say.
If we keep guns out of the hands of violent criminals, then we are violating the 2nd Amendment. That's what I hear loud and clear from you and the NRA.
Law in Order? -ha! you don't come close to believing in it.
posted by
Xeno-x
on May 1, 2010 at 2:19 PM
| link to this | reply
then again you aren't a mayor of a major city
seething in gun violence
you don't have to worry about people around you getting murdered with guns.
If you were, maybe you'd have an entirely different perspective.
What you are saying is that the 2nd Amendment basically allows possession of guns by anyone -- that crimnals should have guns -- that there should be no restrictions on handguns so that handgun violence could increase.
And, as I said previously, you want increased possession and use of handguns -- and you believe in Law and Order -- allow the Justice System to deal with gun violence. Only thing, it would sot quite a bit more for this to happen -- and you want fewer taxes -- so we conceivably could have a problem here -- more money is spent on law enforcement so less money can be spent on such things as roads, streets, trash collection, etc.
It would be fine if you would address what I say.
posted by
Xeno-x
on May 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: Xeno...
the thing is -- what do you perceive as unconstitutional vis a vis the 2nd Amendment.
certain gun restrictions? upholding Chicago's bans on guns? Let me put it this way -- you help overturn Chicago's gun laws and then move there to live -- right in the middle of all the gun violence. How's that?
posted by
Xeno-x
on May 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM
| link to this | reply
Xeno...
Would You Now Like to Try and address the topic of the post? Advocating getting a ruling on our Constitution from the "World Court" AADD?
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on May 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM
| link to this | reply
isn't it odd that I don't see it that way?
those who would kill people with guns are getting them form gun dealers at gun shows.
What you want to do is allow this to continue.
What you will say is that we need more law enforcement.
You want lower taxes -- so how do you propose paying for more law enforcement?
It's like the Kennedy bill that wanted to outlaw armor piercing ammunition whose sole purpose was to kill police officers. You made it into something outlawing hunting ammunition when nothing could be farther from the truth.
I own guns. I hunt. I support the Second Amendment. Yet, gun violence is too rampant. We keep laws as they are with your interpretation of the Second Amendment and we will have more murders by firearms.
And not just in poor neighborhoods. Check your local TV news -- see how widespread this is. Reaching into the suburbs.
Revive the Brady Bill.
posted by
Xeno-x
on May 1, 2010 at 7:39 AM
| link to this | reply