Go to Why can't I sue the whole country?
- Add a comment
- Go to LET'S TALK ABOUT THOSE 'HATE FILLED' PODCASTS I DO
Okay RSM, you just admitted to having lied here in a comment...
I will be very interested in your post, although I really doubt you will be fair and objective. Although it should be interesting to see if you can be honest and actually listen to a podcast before you criticize it. I will also be surprised to see you form your own opinion without.
Now should we get back to the integrity issue now? Are you not the one who goes off on how horrible and untrustworthy all liberal are for whatever reason you pull out of you a$$ that day? You just admitted to having been lying here... Am I suppose to trust anything you say from here on out?
posted by
kooka_lives
on March 18, 2010 at 7:34 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: RSM, what is that suppose to mean?
Oh, don't worry. I will listen to a full podcast then write an objective post about it. Ok?
posted by
RedStatesMan
on March 18, 2010 at 5:28 PM
| link to this | reply
RSM, what is that suppose to mean?
Is that it?
That is your full reply to me catching you in a lie?
No twisting your words to try and keep you lie going?
Or are you going to go and listen to at least two of them now and then come back and pretend you had listened to them all along?
Wow, that is just... I am waiting to see just where you are going to try and take this now.
posted by
kooka_lives
on March 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: Wow RSM, I now know you did NOT listen to our podcasts at all
You better think again about who is being set up.
posted by
RedStatesMan
on March 16, 2010 at 8:52 AM
| link to this | reply
kooka,
nice going!
posted by
dsm_tchr
on March 14, 2010 at 6:35 PM
| link to this | reply
Wow RSM, I now know you did NOT listen to our podcasts at all
Here I go and make an obvious set up and you took the bait. If you had listened to our podcasts you would hot have answered like that. And of course you made the answer so open in hopes of keeping this little lie of yours going. You are not a gentleman who gives anyone a chance and you have no integrity at all.
The ONLY time we really talked about Muslim we were very critical about them, criticizing a group of them for physically assaulting their brother who stayed Christian to try and convert him. We highly praised the brother for staying true to his Christian beliefs. So I guess this is the kind of views you disagree with then?
As for global warming... Well we have only talked about that issue ONCE. And when we did we talked about how it is now a religion unto itself and can be as dangerous as any religion when taken to an extreme. So I guess that is another view we expressed in the podcasts that you disagree with?
It is clear that all you did was give a quick glance at the basics and pretend that you listened, while still holding on to your sad ignorant and biased views about myself and liberals in general. You seemed to think you could somehow fake you way through this by sticking to your generic BS and answers all my questions with vague answers based on stereotypes you blindly cling to. That is just sad and shows you true self all to well.
And it was not me who outdated you beliefs. Those beliefs outdated themselves. We as a society have only truly grown ever time we have seen just how outdated conservative, Biblical based ideas really are. The end of slavery, rights for women and minorities all came about when your beliefs were realized to be outdated. This country's greatness and path to true freedom are all based on your beliefs being outdated.
Glad to see you admitting that the Harry Reid comment was nothing but you pointlessly going off topic. As for my answer... It is sad when anyone's family suffers no matter who they are. Nothing political or news worthy about it though really. I hope both his wife and daughter recover. Was there really any point to asking that question? What were you hoping to prove with my answer?
posted by
kooka_lives
on March 14, 2010 at 1:00 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: RSM, could you answer my questions for once?
Whether it is Muslims or global warming how in the world would you think I would agree with a liberal podcast panel about anything?
You are for me having my opinions but my beliefs are outdated???? Oh, what a contradiction Sir LogicMan please tell me what type of logic formed those two thoughts. However, I guess this does prove that someone did die and leave you in charge of outdating beliefs.
On Harry Reid, I simply asked you a question. No, it had nothing to do with this post but it was simply a question.
posted by
RedStatesMan
on March 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM
| link to this | reply
RSM, could you answer my questions for once?
I know the whole idea of you actually staying on topic and addressing the questions given you is something you are fully unable to grasp, but please for once just try it. I know you much prefer to hide your ignorance behind rude comments and personal attacks that have nothing to do with what we've been talking about, bu tit gets old and only shows you to have a weak stance to begin with.
I really am starting to wodner if you actually did listen to the podcasts. Not all rants are 'hate filled'. If you felt they were, could you please give me some examples where you felt that. And give me some examples of other things that were said which you felt were 'hate filled'.
What did you think about what we said about the Muslims?
Did you agree with our comments about global warming?
Also, you made the claim that we do not use facts, logic and reasoning. Please give some examples of this. I don't at all ming criticism, but it needs to be constructive. Show me where we are 'hate filled' and lacking in logic and reasoning. I am all for you having your opinions, I just ask that if you are going to be critical, give examples of what you disliked. Sam did a great job of that and what she said I can use. Nothing you have said is of any value becasue it is too vague and has the feel of someone who did not actually listen to the podcasts but is instead criticizing it because of his preformed biased and ignorance of it.
And yes, your beliefs are clearly outdated and you very much live in your own sad little world, that is so isolated and limited that I am surprised you have room to breath.
I am also compeltley puzzled as to what Harry Reid's family and their tragedy has to do with anything related to this post. Why did you bring that up here? Are you really that desperate to get things off topic?
posted by
kooka_lives
on March 13, 2010 at 6:34 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: RSM, now that is more like it
How did you feel about Harry Reid's wife and daughter being in a car accident?
posted by
RedStatesMan
on March 13, 2010 at 12:57 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: RSM, now that is more like it
"My little world." Ha! Classy! You have no idea of you who are talking to nor do you know anything about me. "Out dated beliefs"? Sorry but I did not receive a memo from God about my beliefs being outdated. Are you in charge of outdating beliefs now?
Glad you watch Hannity, keep it up!
Rants are not "love filled" usually so.....
Let's see how you like my latest post: Government Fails, People Don't!
Have a great weekend pal!
posted by
RedStatesMan
on March 13, 2010 at 12:55 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: RSM, you are wrong as always
I just gave you a chance, actually two chances and I have come to the same conclusion that I had before I listened. This is my opinion and I still have the right to my own opinion. Good afternoon!
posted by
RedStatesMan
on March 13, 2010 at 12:49 PM
| link to this | reply
RSM, now that is more like it
Great to see you for once stepping up the plate and showing that you will at least from time to time try move beyond your little world you've built out of out dated beliefs, ignorance and a need to attack anything that does not agree with you.
But then you loose me. Did you find the podcasts to be 'hate filled'? That was the claim you made. And if it was 'hate filled', could you tell me what in them felt 'hate filled' to you? Outside of that, them being 'what you expected'... Okay then. It sounds to me that you went into this with all of your ignorance and biases at full force, ready to judge everything without actually listening to what is being said.
And we are doing this for fun and don't see it going any where, so we would agree that national syndication is most likely not going to happen.
So then we get to your new claims. Yes, we did state our opinions, but we did use facts, logic and reasoning through out. I would love an example or two of where we failed to do this. Also it would help to know which podcasts you listened to, or at least which topics we talked about. And to use Hannity as an example... I've seen enough of his show to know he is big on ignoring facts, logic and reasoning at all turns. The way he is able to 'win' his arguments is by bullying those who disagree with him into not being able to speak long enough to present the actual facts, logic and reasoning that proves him wrong.
Although some of how you present this makes me wodner if you actually did listen to the podcast. Bryan does not really ask many questions during the podcast itself, making me wodner if you made some assumption about the format we follow. But I will go a head and take you word for it and figure that like so many other things it just went over your head and you failed to grasp what was going on.
And still,since you finished your comment up repeating yourself with a claim, I have to finish by repeating the question. You said this is what you expected, which originally was that they were 'hate filled'. Now that you have listened to them, do you still make that claim? And if you still feel they were 'hate filled', give me an example or two as to what made them so.
posted by
kooka_lives
on March 13, 2010 at 8:06 AM
| link to this | reply
RSM, you are wrong as always
I am replying to your comment n order here, so this is a reply to your first comment
Sam comment was the kind of thing I was looking for. And being 'preachy' is NOT the same as 'hate filled'.
And as for you being a 'gentleman' and being willing to 'give someone at least a chance'. Wow, that is about the biggest load of BS you have ever served up here on blogit. You have never once come close to giving me a chance. As soon as you knew I was an atheist and a liberal, you had already preformed all your views about me and attacked anything and everything I said, no matter what.
And no, my claim here is far from being weak. Just the fact that you said that before you listened to the podcats says a whole lot about your character and how judgmental you really are.
posted by
kooka_lives
on March 13, 2010 at 7:49 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: Sam
I just listened to two of them and I must say that I applaud you attempt however this was useless. You do not fool me, nor will you ever. It was exactly what I predicted it to be. I nailed it because I have been along this road so many times that this podcast was not shocking in the least bit. Do not expect national syndication out this attempt. I do applaud your efforts to express yourself while we still have freedom of speech, at least until your boy hussein sees otherwise.
Here's your lesson:
You need to work on your facts, logic and reasoning to answer the questions from Brian. You seem to have many answers but no facts. It is just what you say back to him. You formed opinions with no substance. Hannity would have bit your head off in two seconds then spit you out the next second so if you want to make a go of this then leave out the "world according to kooka" part. Otherwise, you will be eaten alive. Brian's questions were even throwing you off course. With all of you being young liberals, that is not good for your cause. If he can throw you off then imagine what a conservative would do to you! Keep practicing but I was right in my assumption, just like I knew I would be on this topic.
Have a great weekend!
posted by
RedStatesMan
on March 12, 2010 at 9:48 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: Sam
Well, from the first comment on this post it looks as though I was 100% correct however as the conservative gentleman that I am, I just may listen one day so that I can once again state what I said before. Completely unlike liberals, I am a gentleman and will give someone at least a chance. You must admit that your claim here is weak at best. Just look at your first comment. Since I am a Christian, I will listen. Imagine you taking that kind of an approach!?
posted by
RedStatesMan
on March 12, 2010 at 9:19 PM
| link to this | reply
Sam
That gentleman was most likely me, and that was really the only podcast we started off like that.
It actually is helpful to know that I came off preachy, although ranting generally is preachy. In the future we might hold off such things for later in the podcast if we think we need them, since you are saying they turn people away.
You might try our earlier podcasts where we get right into things. There are four others and none of them start off that way I promise you.
posted by
kooka_lives
on March 12, 2010 at 3:25 PM
| link to this | reply
I went to the link and it opened with a 'preachy' atmosphere although the gentleman said it was a rant! So I became disinterested! sam
posted by
sam444
on March 12, 2010 at 1:57 PM
| link to this | reply