Comments on Is that how I come across?

Go to Liberals LoungeAdd a commentGo to Is that how I come across?

J In any event it’s peace on earth, goodwill towards others love. BC-A, Bill’s RLJst

posted by BC-A on December 25, 2009 at 4:51 AM | link to this | reply

Hey, Liberalady!
Where are you? I hope that you are not ill again. The last I saw you were feeling bad. I pray that you will feel better and that you will be healed by the ailment.

posted by RedStatesMan on December 22, 2009 at 11:28 AM | link to this | reply

RSM, yet agian you show yourself to be clueless
The topic was HOMOSEXUALITY, not abuse or harm to children in any way shape or form.  Are or you really so caught up in your baseless BS an usual attempts to change the subject to make personal attacks towards me, that you have fully forgotten what your own post started off being about?

There is NO link between true homosexuals (Adults who are sexually attracted to other adults of the same gender) and child abuse/molestation.

I am very big on protecting children myself, that is why neither of my boys is allowed to be left alone with their overly conservative grandfather (My wife's father).  Not because he is conservative, but becasue of what he did to my wife when she was growing up.  Yet I know several homosexuals who I would trust fully to watch my boys.

I will go and try to get this exchange back into your comments section where it belongs.

posted by kooka_lives on December 20, 2009 at 7:18 PM | link to this | reply

Re: RSM, but that wasn't the topic of your post
Whether it is child molestation or any harm to a child I am at war against it. I do not categorize crap like that because it does not matter...get it? Can you understand that at all? It does not matter how a child is abused whether it is abortion or molestation such in your case or a baby being shaken all of it is evil and this evil must be eliminated. can you understand that? Don't give me some liberal bullcrap either. Write your little post on it but your thought process is wrong. NOTHING MATTERS EXCEPT A CHILD IS HURT OR KILLED GET IT? Can you possibly get that through your liberal skull? Can you? I doubt it!    

posted by RedStatesMan on December 19, 2009 at 11:05 PM | link to this | reply

RSM, but that wasn't the topic of your post
You were talking about homosexuality.  Child molestation is much like rape and is normally about control, NOT sex. Take it from someone who WAS molested as a child (By a young girl) you show yourself to lack any understanding of the issue.

And then you of and insult us all by claiming that because your daughter was shaken as a baby, that that somehow gives you a better grasp on caring about the welfare of chidlren, which is what you straight out said in that post.  That alone was abotu as insulting as ti gets and shows that you need to get your ego under control.

But once more, this is the wrong place for this exchange.  Give me time and I will write a full reply to you in that comments section where this belongs and you can spit out your ignorance about child molestation and homosexuals there.

posted by kooka_lives on December 18, 2009 at 8:56 AM | link to this | reply

Re: RSM, I have never once attacked your family
What? You seem to be freaking out on here. Abuse to a child can come from many different forms and a babtsitter shaking my child is one of those. What in the hell are you talking about? Don't answer...it will take me to long to figure out some twisted liberal crap...let's just say bye!

posted by RedStatesMan on December 17, 2009 at 7:01 PM | link to this | reply

RSM, I have never once attacked your family
I would never do such a thing. Now pointing out that you have trivialized your daughter's condition by using it as a means to try and win arguments when you mention it in blogs where it is 100% off topic, is NOT an attack on your family or your daughter, but a observation about YOU and where I see you lacking in character.

Also, if you go and look you will see I already addressed this in reply in your comments section.

In fact I have more to say and will say them in your comments section, not here.

posted by kooka_lives on December 17, 2009 at 1:04 PM | link to this | reply

Re: liberlady
You just asked me earlier if I deleted one of your comments and I TOLD YOU DID NOT! Now you are asking liberalady. This proves that whatever is going on here is unusual. I will defend your right to comment on my blog anytime. When you attack my family then I will block you. I have never deleted you nor anyone else so you need to investigate why. I welcome your comments as long as you do not make false comments about anything I post about my family. I do not do that to you! I even sympathized and offered prayer when your brother-in-law passed away yet you seem to be different. Even since then, I have let you have your say so you need to check out your claims of deleted comments.  

posted by RedStatesMan on December 16, 2009 at 8:56 PM | link to this | reply

In the previous comment, the last paragraph; I believe that is a fair assessment, maybe even stated too lightly. sam 

posted by sam444 on December 16, 2009 at 7:43 PM | link to this | reply

liberlady,
It looks like someone went and got eh mighty Blogit police (Who have already time and again showed the favor the conservative bloggers and reward those who are unable to handle people who do not agree with their views) to look at my recent comments and delete a few. My guess is that one I put here (One that in no way violated Blogit policy) got pulled because someone is unable to deal with people who speak their minds.

So I am going to repost my views about justi here and see what happens. After all she has made far more than her share of attacks on me that are far worse then the opinion of her that I am about to state here.  If blogit wishes to pull my views on her, than I ask them to go and look over her blogs and comments about me and pull all of them as well.  But that would only work if they wanted to be fair and do the right thing.

Sorry about that rant. I am just getting really upset over seeing this kind of censorship that greatly favors one group of people while restricting the voice of those who disagree with them.

Anyway.  My original comment was something like "Justi has a weak sense of reality and often seems to not know what she is talking about.  One time after I left her a very polite comment that showed why I disagreed with her post, but that I respected her right to her views, she blocked me and claimed I needed to stop harassing her. The present blocking she has one me came because I said that people who create lies and spread them as a form of propaganda for political reasons are childish. This was during a time where she was posting many pieces of propaganda that I kept proving to her were false, yet she kept doing it and never tried to check the actual facts.  At that time she really pushed things and tried to get a Blogit lynch mob after me, hoping to drive me away from the site. She will see anyone who openly and aggressively state view that counter her as being angry. 

posted by kooka_lives on December 16, 2009 at 7:35 PM | link to this | reply

liberlady
Did you delete my comment abotu justi?

posted by kooka_lives on December 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM | link to this | reply

justi hallucinates
you should read her reactions fo what Kooka and I have to say.  What she reads into it is ridiculous.

posted by Xeno-x on December 14, 2009 at 11:47 AM | link to this | reply

You most certainly do not come across that way.  And even if you were an angry woman, I would challenge your accuser to illustrate how she herself comes across.  You had barely walked through the door before you were subjected to snide commentary on this site, and now this?

The first word that sprang to my mind reading that comment was "projection".  Those of us who claim to be so wise and well read would do well to look that one up and memorize its definition.  Labeling a person "angry", "stupid", "useless", etc, is a handy way to avoid dealing with our own diminished/denied self-perception.  Most of us are guilty of this from time to time - but some of us choose to live here all the time.  The road to contention - in my view - is paved with labels and accusations.  Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could all stop doing this?

Projection

8. Psychology

  1. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or suppositions to others: "Even trained anthropologists have been guilty of unconscious projection—of clothing the subjects of their research in theories brought with them into the field" (Alex Shoumatoff).

  2. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or desires to someone or something as a naive or unconscious defense against anxiety or guilt.

    The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
    Copyright © 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 

posted by myrrhage_ on December 14, 2009 at 11:46 AM | link to this | reply