Comments on The 'Sugar Daddies' behind Feminism!

Go to Dave's Tips on Living. - Add a comment - Go to The 'Sugar Daddies' behind Feminism!

urdiscomcircuavate

posted by Sudanym_ on April 14, 2009 at 5:14 PM | link to this | reply

u make me read 2 much.

posted by Sudanym_ on April 14, 2009 at 5:14 PM | link to this | reply

To Readers generally

I have always written that the body is a tool or robot, and that the piloting forces are either soul or dark side.. both invisible. Death of the body is when the life-giving soul leaves. So, I reason that gender and race are unimportant as causes to fight for. Feminism is one of those false causes. They victimized me..so I know firsthand how they operate. The elites fueled this movement as part of their divide and rule strategy. Though the masses outnumber the elites, the masses cannot ever unite to overthrow them because of divide and rule. The sex school of society is run by dark side males and cooperative females both of whom are predatory. Whatever kinds of hostility or issues that arise from this school or subsequent interactions, dark side women cannot beat dark side males. So they remember the hurts and wait until they find males they can handle, then they pounce. Feminism hides the fact that a tribe or color of dark sides has both male and females members....and, they do not fight each other. So, in the final analysis, why would the elite males fund feminism? Its the men who run things on this planet...very rich men. They are near untouchable. Common men are not. So let the feminists fight their own...leave soul-people alone. I have researched this and I use plain words to relate what I see. I do not deal in obfuscation for the purposes of deniability.

posted by Soul_Builder101 on April 13, 2009 at 5:46 PM | link to this | reply

To those people of protoplasm

The people of protoplasm do not get it! Do I draw you to my blog? The header was the title of an article to which I linked to. If you read the article ...it basiclly said that feminism gets its funding from male-lead 'foundations'. Women are not in control of that. It said that feminism is an elitist device for population control, family unit destruction etc etc. It also advises on doing of the research to verify that feminism is being funded and backed up by males. The customary blahblahblah always emanates from the people of protoplasm, thinking that I have strategized a clean-up among other things. Catch hold of yourself protoplasm people. I write without you ever being a factor in what I write. Feminists are wasting their lives and ours. They have turned mine into a passing parade. Without snake-power what are they? Nothing but zeroes. The only problem I had in writing this was too much information. Thus I had to arbitrarily separate the paragraphs.3 paragraphs is better than 10 short ones. Thanks, but I learnt the art of writing decades ago. Don't get maternalistic with me!

posted by Soul_Builder101 on April 13, 2009 at 5:27 PM | link to this | reply

when you judge people by what they are

rather than by who they are, then you are walking a road to blind hatred and violence.

posted by lionreign on April 13, 2009 at 8:11 AM | link to this | reply

Re: Re: This entire essay is discombobulated and circumnavigated.

Hmmm, sure I'd like to hear more on the issue. Getting interesting!

posted by Bhaskar.ing on April 13, 2009 at 7:37 AM | link to this | reply

Re: This entire essay is discombobulated and circumnavigated.

Pat.......too bad you got sucked into this one. You should know by now that everything in this blog of his had "crazy" written all over it. Won't matter how he cleans it up........it will still be garbage.....

posted by ZenMom on April 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM | link to this | reply

This entire essay is discombobulated and circumnavigated.

I was led into it by the title -- the wildly oppositional notions of "sugar daddies" and "feminism" which in my view are diametrically opposed to one another. So here's a suggestion: get your thoughts together, make one point in each paragraph and flesh out the basic idea. At the end, sum it up. That way your readers can figure out what you're getting at and respond with some degree of understanding.

posted by Pat_B on April 13, 2009 at 6:09 AM | link to this | reply

Soul

I have found all 'isms' to be fanatical and thus bloody wrong. Great title though

posted by Bhaskar.ing on April 13, 2009 at 6:07 AM | link to this | reply

I was slightly confused with your first paragraph Dave......

I found it a bit contradictory (maybe I didn't read it right?) for the rest rather interesting; many blessings and thanks