Go to Religion in the Modern World
- Add a comment
- Go to Still at number one where this blog belongs
CAMOE - it is always entertaining to hear from someone whom we can be
certain would not endure their own opinions if they were on the receiving end.
You neglected to mention any of the other persons on this site that have been long time bloggers and who are still rehashing the same things over and over again other than Kooka and myself. I guess we can presume from this that you take issue with a certain type of religious perspective moreso than anything else. This of course just makes you another chucklehead that wants society to remain an unlevel playing field of favoring one type of worldview. Then you have the audacity to suggest that others "get some real education" . . . thanx for stopping in, I hope you enjoyed your little venting session.
posted by
gomedome
on September 8, 2008 at 6:12 AM
| link to this | reply
You misjudge your perceived competition when you refer
to the "craziest" as those who will rule, win the top spot, or what-have-you. Let's face it, not many in society or have the time nor inclination to "blog it out" with you or anyone else; no matter what the topic... (as Red Skelton so aptly put it, "My laundry's piling up".) so suck that in your over-analyzed navel, you frustrated preacher-wannabe. I've been "gone" 4 years and you're still harping the same tune. Haven't you found a bigger playground? I should think you'd be out of Seminary by now. You and Kooka belong on the same boat. Do us a favor and get some real education. Then you'll have something to blog about.
posted by
CAMOE
on September 8, 2008 at 5:25 AM
| link to this | reply
Soul_Builder101 - that comment was even funnier than the ones before
You make this statement in your first comment: "To infer that religious people are crazy because they aspire to goodness is to propagate godlessness." . . . but never address my challenge of where this was inferred or implied in this post. This makes the suggestion of my "crooked arguments" rather humorous, you cannot even comprehend English to the point of distinguishing between obvious subtleties. Sure you can use flowery words and construct what seem like articulate arguments but they are almost entirely premised on nonsense.
The Masons kept you from working for years? I've heard sorry ass excuses for not finding a job but that one takes the cake. It is also obvious that you construct your hopelessly impossible conspiracy theories from a position outside of the social circles of the people you insist are guilty of these things. If you knew anything at all about the Masons for example, you would know that they have only become fodder for chucklehead conspiracy theorists because they maintain a few "secret" rituals (so secret that everyone in the world knows about them). There is no malevolence orchestrated by that organization as policy in the way you are describing, you suggesting as much is nothing more than unsubstantiated slander.
Most people outside of conspiracy theory chuckleheads, are grateful for the nearly 200 childrens hospitals they have built through the Shriners in North America.
posted by
gomedome
on September 7, 2008 at 10:43 AM
| link to this | reply
There is a saying that....who can't hear will feel. You , obviously elect to feel. I only write what is within my field of experience and research. I am enjoying this little banter. Where else can I find an array of choice invectives, crooked arguments, calumny, detraction, obfuscation and snide remarks? Being well-honed in the critical analysis of language and pattern of arguments, it makes me smile to see what is being shoveled at me. I prefer the plain words. You try to intellectualize for a false paradigm and try to strong-arm people of different perspectives into your corner. This comment relates to your blog, not just this post. I have been locked out of employment by masons for many years. There is a conspiracy and I am not to blame. Open your eyes and start looking at the world outside, maybe you will see stuff that I have experienced... and just maybe you will see that money-hungry elites are not the good people they pretend to be. I felt I need to tell you this so you can change yourself. Keep in mind what I wrote. The proof will come. I wish you all the best of enlightenment.
posted by
Soul_Builder101
on September 7, 2008 at 6:56 AM
| link to this | reply
Soul_Builder101 - you simply cannot possibly be this clueless, you must be
putting me on.
I have never discredited your ability to articulate the written word, it has admittedly impressed me upon occassion. Instead, I stand in awe of how you utilize the language to promote gibberish. It is almost always devoid of logic, liberally laced with tenuous connections to reality and is quite often loaded with nothing more than unsubstantiated claims.
If you have a concern about something you probably know very little about; (in eating cloned animal meat) . . . don't friggin eat it. The different options for protein are staggering in their sheer abundance on this continent.
That NWO nonsense will eventually embarrass you amongst real intellects. I can't say it any blunter than that.
I see a post coming to address you further.
posted by
gomedome
on September 6, 2008 at 10:04 PM
| link to this | reply
cantey_1975 - I appreciate you saying that and that is why as you know,
I lament the day the new format came in,
. . . it curtailed what could have been a lot different than it is today.
posted by
gomedome
on September 6, 2008 at 9:48 PM
| link to this | reply
Re: Soul_Builder101 - I know that this is a tough one for you but try just
Firstly, my combatant, you have to get get a grip on language. You obviously don't have this. Cheap inflammatory emotion-driven words do not convince anyone. I am schooled in this art. Bullshit cannot replace accurate description. Conspiracies? Hope you love the cloned meat you have been eating! It has been in circulation for a while. Only the USDA now tells us that they approved it because it is safe! Hope you seek truth and not be encumbered by the stratagems of the NWO!
posted by
Soul_Builder101
on September 6, 2008 at 5:08 PM
| link to this | reply
it is inevitable. But since your blog is a Blogit institution, it's difficult to imagine being topped. You've invented quite a unique product.
posted by
calmcantey75
on September 6, 2008 at 5:07 PM
| link to this | reply
Soul_Builder101 - I know that this is a tough one for you but try just once
to comment or refute what was actually said in the post.
I did not "infer" that religious people are crazy as a generalization anywhere in this post as you imply in your comment. Anyone with a rudimentary grasp of the English language can determine from how I chose my words that was not what was said. I am instead speaking of a handful of individuals but no one specifically, that spew crazy religious nonsense which attracts attention (and readership) by virtue of its craziness. If the shoe happens to fit your blog entries . . . .
As for the rest of your blatherings, you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you on the ass. Your blog entries are entirely dedicated to reconciling your twisted world vision with reality but unfortunately reality is losing. As for blocking you, that will never happen. I enjoy clubbing you over the head with your own bullshit too much and the fact that doing so propels my blog upwards doesn't hurt either.
So how does one aspire to goodness? Do they write nonsensical drivel blaming everyone else in the world for their own shortcomings and create a list of people that they hate like you have done? Is proliferating paranoid delusions of impossible conspiracies important as well? Help me out here, you're the one claiming to be aspiring to goodness . . .
posted by
gomedome
on September 6, 2008 at 4:26 PM
| link to this | reply
If you do not want me to comment...block me! I think you are crazy. To infer that religious people are crazy because they aspire to goodness is to propagate godlessness. I have enough proof of God's existence. It is a pity though that you never pursued the truth. You may have had the experiences to confirm what I and others know for fact. I, obviously, don't care for #1. If I did, I would be #1 on blogit, not simply Religion & Spirituality. Your choice persuasive language doesn't rankle me or faze me! I can talk back! Thanks for the opportunity to state my case. I have no war with you...if you want one, please indicate!
posted by
Soul_Builder101
on September 6, 2008 at 4:09 PM
| link to this | reply