Go to IT CURES HOARSENESS! The "Global Warming" Hoax
- Add a comment
- Go to This year so far coolest for at least 5 years
Arctic ice is melting - of course it's cooler - cold melts ice -- right?
posted by
Xeno-x
on September 16, 2008 at 7:35 AM
| link to this | reply
SORRY BUT . . . (and I have set links in my blog)
the general overall temperature pattern around the world is warmer.
warmer than previous decades.
you take the averages and you can see that.
I have provided the data to demonstrate that.
that's right, your potholes are in only one place, not the whole city.
cooling is in isolated places, not around the world.
My most recent post should help.
posted by
Xeno-x
on August 27, 2008 at 11:44 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: in five years -- and it is still above norm
And I did not dispute that. What I am disputing is the notion that it is only getting warmer, as touted by The GORE and other "global wamers." Surely you wouldn't buy into that, now, would you?
As for differing facts and figures, I repeat once again - the problem is in how you are interpreting the facts and figures. See our exchanges, at your place and mine, on this year's tornado season for the prime example.
Look at it this way. Consider the example of the street on which I live. Using data I can easily collect, I can easily provide facts and figures proving that streets in Toledo, Ohio are in disrepair. I can just as easily prove that cars can travel Toledo streets at no faster than 15 or 20 mph.
Those facts and figures are perfectly accurate for our street. But while they certainly do apply to many other streets in our fair city, they are not applicable to most of them.
Same for meteoroligical and climatological data. You and I can look at the same data and draw entirely different conclusions. To use my example, you are interpeting it from the perspective of the street. I am interpreting it from the perspective of the city as a whole.
posted by
WriterofLight
on August 24, 2008 at 5:13 PM
| link to this | reply
in five years -- and it is still above norm
the figures and graphs supplied by NOAA supply a larger picture. they show higher than norm temperatures. it is still a trend.
and I have supplied a link to El nino and La Nina in my blog, that disputes somewhat what has been stated here, this by no less than the NOAA -- again, facts and figures --
how come my figures and facts in general seem to dispute what you have given us?
how come the records of the United States Government Weather Service are different than what you supply in your blog?
Do you think their figures, their readings and such are totally inaccurate and that what you have supplied, from a bit of a biased source or sources, are perfectly accurate?
posted by
Xeno-x
on August 22, 2008 at 5:55 AM
| link to this | reply