Comments on Is “Global Warming” Theory Based on a Faulty Premise?

Go to IT CURES HOARSENESS! The "Global Warming" HoaxAdd a commentGo to Is “Global Warming” Theory Based on a Faulty Premise?

I haven't seen anything from Dr. Spencer that really refutes

that the climate is warming.

And, speaking of predictions, many were made a decade or so ago, and many are coming true.

The effects are here.  They are measureable.

posted by Xeno-x on July 16, 2008 at 2:29 PM | link to this | reply

Re: YES THERE ARE VARIABLES -- BUT . . .

Keep reading, my friend. Dr. Spencer has much to say about the claims of Co2-caused warming.

Let me turn your last statement on its ear: If we do something that harms the human condition, such as compromising health care, power generation, or the economy, and it turns out to be false, should those who forced needless and harmful action to be taken be held responsible for the damage?

posted by WriterofLight on July 13, 2008 at 7:31 PM | link to this | reply

YES THERE ARE VARIABLES -- BUT . . .
We are experiencing a warming never experienced in recorded history -- and comparable to the spikes shown in the ice core samples per the graph I consistently produce to show the correlation between CO2 and temperature rise.

And every link and every graph I have referred to here demonstrate full well that temperatures throughout the world are rising.

Watch this September to see how much the North Polar ice shrinks.

I am amazed that you still want to take the chance that human activity has nothing to do with it -- you recommend inactivity by what  you say.

If we do nothing and it does prove to be true, then all those who have opposed any action are responsible for the disaster to follow.

posted by Xeno-x on July 12, 2008 at 7:28 AM | link to this | reply