Go to IT CURES HOARSENESS! The "Global Warming" Hoax
- Add a comment
- Go to If “Global Warming” is “Global,” then Please Explain This:
Re: PRECIPITATION HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH GLOBAL WARMING
Actually, you may be wrong on that. A meterologist at the NOAA Cleveland office whom I know says that increased precipitation, at least here in the Great Lakes, is a likely consequence of a warming climate.
Without going into the argument about what causes the warming, or whether or not it is truly global, his observation illustrates another flaw in "global warming" theory - that all priniciples of meteorlogy and climate apply universally, in the simplest and most generalized manner possible. Tell you what - I just might come up with an article about that.
Beyond this, the irony I was pointing out went
-------------->>>
right over your head. It has to be cold in order to snow. Here is a record snowfall - in June, no less - when the climate is supposed to be warming worldwide. If this warming was global, then why did it not fall as rain?
posted by
WriterofLight
on June 12, 2008 at 2:59 PM
| link to this | reply
PRECIPITATION HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH GLOBAL WARMING
I have the data and the facts that demonstrate that the climate is warming.
St. Louis has had more precip than normal -- enough that if it didn't rain til October, we'd have normal for the year by then.
In the mountains, all that extra precip is converted to snow. It's common for them to have 3 ft of snow at times when the plains are at 70o.
The information you quote is indisputable; however, it is not an indicator that global warming is not a fact.
Again, you are grasping at straws and setting up straw men in a desperate effort to prove your position.
All I have to do is refer my readers to the hard data as put forth in NOAA's site. A pretty solid edifice, I must add. A concrete wall that you have failed to knock down.
posted by
Xeno-x
on June 11, 2008 at 6:16 AM
| link to this | reply