Comments on Notes on the Historic accuracy of the Writings about Jesus the Nazerene

Go to Choose NOWAdd a commentGo to Notes on the Historic accuracy of the Writings about Jesus the Nazerene

Good Heavens
This comment area looks like a blog by itself.  Much appreciated and I will have a look at the Jefferson version for sure

posted by AardigeAfrikaner on April 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM | link to this | reply

AA, when u complete your version, read Th. Jefferson's edited Bible. He was

a DEIST and loved the moral teachings of Jesus, and rejected miracles and "hocus-pocus" in the Bible, allegedly. SHALOM

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/8/86/Macro_dandelion_Fcb981.JPG/503px-Macro_dandelion_Fcb981.JPG

posted by ILLUMINATI8 on April 24, 2008 at 5:13 PM | link to this | reply

actually, the Gospels portray a pretty real personage

there is a personality showing through, one that, were we not brainwashed with a traditional view of the person, can be pretty well psychoanalyzed.

It's just that the writers come from a personal viewpoint and inject their personal views into the Gospels; also, it seems that perhaps others have added onto the original writing.

I tend to see that there was more room for discussion in the Jewish world (much debate over the Torah) and differing sects (Essenes come to mind).  Also, the Greek world was open to discussion and debate, thus the Apostle Paul's success.

It is when, as you said, explicit statements against the status quo are made that free speech ends.

posted by Xeno-x on April 24, 2008 at 11:03 AM | link to this | reply

Jesus said, "Only believe."   sam

posted by sam444 on April 24, 2008 at 6:49 AM | link to this | reply

Re:

posted by AardigeAfrikaner on April 24, 2008 at 3:36 AM | link to this | reply


posted by __Purple_Mermaid11__ on April 24, 2008 at 3:11 AM | link to this | reply