Go to 3,000 Famous Last Words!
- Add a comment
- Go to Quote of the Day
independent JUDGEMENT
posted by
thecryptkeeper
on March 27, 2008 at 10:21 PM
| link to this | reply
I think, her chances are fading fast. We won't be seeing a male first lady after all.
posted by
vogue
on March 27, 2008 at 11:20 AM
| link to this | reply
Re: Pulling out all the stops to win this, ain't she, kingmi? The
saul_relative, Yes. At first I thought that the addict in this relationship (Bill) was doing the self-destruction of the family political influence, but now I'm beginning to wonder if it isn't Hillary who has in mind destroying the Clinton legacy (such as it is). After her Tonya Harding routine they won't be able to put Chelsea on the ticket! Ever.
Just one reason why I argued that an untreated co-dependent shouldn't run for the highest office.
posted by
kingmi
on March 27, 2008 at 10:25 AM
| link to this | reply
Pulling out all the stops to win this, ain't she, kingmi? The
Democrats won't be able to blame Ralph Nader for this loss. They can point at Hillary's mudslinging and attempted flanking maneuvers on popular and representational delegation. Most Democrats aren't like Republicans, bitching and moaning about their candidate but still voting for them. Democrats will either vote for the other guy or not vote. Either way, their party candidate loses. Most Republicans would never vote Democratic. Most Republicans would never not vote. This is one of the basic reasons Democrats have such a difficult time in close elections. And it is why they'll lose in November...
posted by
saul_relative
on March 27, 2008 at 7:07 AM
| link to this | reply
Hi my name is Hillary and I am trying to circumvent the intent of the people. sam
posted by
sam444
on March 26, 2008 at 3:41 PM
| link to this | reply
Not if Obama won the State! A dissenting delegate could be in some trouble if he disobeys the will of the electors!
posted by
Soul_Builder101
on March 26, 2008 at 2:03 PM
| link to this | reply