Comments on Rationalism versus Superstition.

Go to Mavro's Politics/ReligionAdd a commentGo to Rationalism versus Superstition.

Regarding your comment on kookas faith post- in case you don't go back
Wanted to make sure you at least knew such a comment would  be challenged. I was  compelled  to respond (must have been my mood) Hope you choose to read it. It wasn't exactly favorable though. 

posted by thoughtfulness on February 14, 2008 at 10:24 AM | link to this | reply

Re: sam444
The fact that you speak of 'the lord' would suggest that you do follow a religion, whether it be your own creation or someone elses.

posted by Mavro on February 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM | link to this | reply

Re: Vairocana
What a lot of babble. I don't have the tools to understand the nonsense that you have written here, infact I would suggest that few people, on this planet, have.

posted by Mavro on February 8, 2008 at 12:33 PM | link to this | reply

You are trapped by the tools you are trying to use to understand that on which the very arising of the tools depend.  You are trying to see your own eye without a mirror.  Reason depends on "mind as such".  Before you have become aware of "mind as such" wherein no dualty or fiction enters you will never understand religion.

posted by AardigeAfrikaner on February 8, 2008 at 12:20 PM | link to this | reply

Religion may be, but the Word of the Lord speaks volumes!  sam

posted by sam444 on February 8, 2008 at 7:37 AM | link to this | reply