Go to sarooster on politics
- Add a comment
- Go to How Crazy Is This?
As Corbin has suggested, sarooster, it all lies in the elimination of
unjustifiable collateral damage. House-to-house, hand-to-hand may be more dangerous, but it is far less costly in "collateral damage" or civilian casualties, therefore far less bad public relations, internationally, in Afghanistan, and domestically...
posted by
saul_relative
on December 11, 2007 at 9:11 PM
| link to this | reply
We get into conflicts where we are damned if we and damned if we don't>>>>>>a catch 22>>>sam
posted by
sam444
on December 10, 2007 at 6:51 AM
| link to this | reply
Then we'd be accused......
of killing another million civilians.......don't you see???
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on December 10, 2007 at 4:28 AM
| link to this | reply