Comments on Global Warming "Greatest Scam in History" - Weather Channel founder

Go to IT CURES HOARSENESS! The "Global Warming" HoaxAdd a commentGo to Global Warming "Greatest Scam in History" - Weather Channel founder

Xenox, xenox, xenox . . .

One more time: No one is denying the climate is changing. The climate is always changing. The issue is why. That's where the problem is. and that's why "global warming" - which is understood to be the theory that human activity is the primary cause of current climate change - is a load of bunk. That is the scam being referred to.

And you're right about severe storms - so long as you ignore 2006 and 2007. Where were all the hurricanes last year and this? The fact is, The GORE and everyone else who claimed that hurricanes would only be worse after 2005 were totally, comprehensively, completely, absolutely, incontrovertibly, utterly, undeniably, indisputably and entirely - short of a lapse into insanity - WRONG. They predicted one thing, and the entirely opposite happened, two years in a row.

posted by WriterofLight on November 13, 2007 at 9:33 PM | link to this | reply

I like that statement in your post:
"As the temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to realize we have been duped."

problem is, these things are occurring now -- they are not to come in the future.  quite some time ago, one of the phenomena predicted was a greater number and greater intensity of hurricanes and other Atlantic storms.  That has indeed occurred.  The year of Katrina, one of the most devastating and powerful storms, was also the year of the most storms, when the Weather Service ran out of names for storms and had to give them numbers instead, the first time that has happened.  That year fulfilled predictions.  And the EPA website to which I refer provides data to show the increase in storms in recent decades over past.

It seems every time I see a statement on this blog, it has already been refuted by the data provided.

posted by Xeno-x on November 13, 2007 at 11:34 AM | link to this | reply

here you go -- citing someone who says there is no climate change
and yet when I present the graphs and facts and figures as noted on the EPA page, you will say that you agree that there is climate change; only that it is natural and not human produced.

what is political about the whole thing is that U.S. corporations in particular, in their shortsightedness, fear that they might not be able to supply their investors with the gross profits that they have made in recent years, thus not attract investors.; and whose money influences particularly the Republican Party and its present spokesperson, our President.

There are no political advantages to asserting that the climate is changing, as the figures tell us; rather, there are more disadvantages in that the aforementioned send their money to those in the political arena who fall in line with their desire for profit.

Do you realize how many sources can be cited to support the assertion that the Earth's climate is changing?  If you read the facts and figures on the web page I have connected to, you are left with admitting that the climate is indeed changing.  To cite one or two people as you have in the face of the evidence presented does not negate the evidence; it simply demonstrates limited vision similar that of Corporate America.

posted by Xeno-x on November 13, 2007 at 11:27 AM | link to this | reply

Global Warming ''Greatest Scam in History''-Weather Channel founder

WriterOfLight: I believe that everyone in the world should respect the environment.  Littering and pollution  is a menace upon our natural resources and people and corporations who engage in these practices should be punished severely. 

    However, until weather forecasters can get 8 day forecasts correct at least 90% of the time, I'm not going to believe what some of them believe will happen to the planet in 20 or 30 years.  No one knows for certain. 

    Regarding the Kyoto Protocol, if these people really cared about the global environment, why are China and India exempt from its draconian edicts?  It's nothing more than a way for these emerging economies to kick the United States ass in manufacturing.  Look at the air pollution from China?  Why doesn't Al Gore talk about it?  As usual, he blames only the United States for global warming and the world's environmental problems. 

posted by WavyDavy on November 11, 2007 at 5:39 PM | link to this | reply

Hoax or not it raised awarness
of our extravagent consumerism, our over population and the pending depletion of natural resources. Who cares if the message was conjured up to be left as a link in the Urban Legend website? The bottom line is that wasteful Americans are thinking about how they live and moving, at a rapid pace to respect this planet. I say, go ahead and wag the dog on this one.

posted by First_Fig on November 10, 2007 at 11:02 PM | link to this | reply