Comments on Are Computer Models for Weather Forecasting Reliable, or Not?

Go to IT CURES HOARSENESS! The "Global Warming" Hoax - Add a comment - Go to Are Computer Models for Weather Forecasting Reliable, or Not?

Re: weather prediction is by its nature an inexact science

INDEED!

So why, then, are the long range climate forecasts of the "global warmers" to be regarded as relatively exact? And why then is the so-called "science" of "global warming" not to be subjected to discovery and correction if said discovery and correction violates the established dogma?

I warned you I'd have you checkmated in your next move.

posted by WriterofLight on August 18, 2007 at 7:54 AM | link to this | reply

Re: HOPE YOU READ MY LATEST AND CLICKED ON THE LINKS

Your citing scripture to justify blind acceptance of "global warming" is specious. We must also discern truth from error. If three people concur in a lie, are they to be believed because there were three of them? There are a lot more than two or three scientists refuting "global warming" theory.

That said - excuse me, written, what evidence does this chart offer, other than coincidental, that any of this is human-caused? What evidence do you offer of the veracity of the sources? (Indeed - it cites the tree ring study, which we just got through demolishing.) What evidence do you offer of the accuracy and completeness of the data, and that it is free of bias?

posted by WriterofLight on August 18, 2007 at 7:49 AM | link to this | reply

weather prediction is by its nature an inexact science

just check your local forecast.

all science is a process of discovery and correction anyway.

posted by Xeno-x on August 16, 2007 at 7:04 AM | link to this | reply

HERE IT IS -- I DON'T SEE MUCH TO ARGUE HERE, DO YOU?
Figure 2. This graph provides reconstructions of Northern Hemisphere average or global average surface temperature variations over the last 1,100 years from six research teams, along with the instrumental record of global average surface temperature. Overall, the curves show a warming around 1000 AD followed by a long general cooling trend that continues until the early 1900s. Each curve illustrates a somewhat different history of temperature changes, with a range of uncertainties that tend to increase backward in time.

posted by Xeno-x on August 16, 2007 at 5:52 AM | link to this | reply

HOPE YOU READ MY LATEST AND CLICKED ON THE LINKS

There are graphs there that give pretty solid evidence that this is a warmer period than we have had for quite some time.

The one gives data from about a half dozen sources.  All of them show an increase in temperatures since 900 AD.

"In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall a thing be established."

Certainly more than one sole source. 

posted by Xeno-x on August 16, 2007 at 5:50 AM | link to this | reply