Go to Question of the Day
- Add a comment
- Go to What's Your Answer? 7-19-07
thanks for reading, may you have a great holiday season!!
posted by
contagion_publishing
on December 20, 2007 at 12:40 PM
| link to this | reply
Do we believe in eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth?
Or must we ensure that the person gets officially penalised by due process of law and then goes through a reformation process? Or am I too dreamy-eyed?
posted by
Straightforward
on July 20, 2007 at 7:52 PM
| link to this | reply
True but cocaine does more damage to the mind than most thought before *
Even though she was a big girl and made her own decisions, whoever she got it from would be an 'accessory' in some fashion. I believe Carroll O'Connor when he said that same very thing when he tried to accomplish a law making dealers 'accessories' to murder should they have dealt drugs to the victim(s) of certain situations. Thanks for input.
posted by
lorettas
on July 19, 2007 at 3:02 PM
| link to this | reply
Hi Loretta...I don't blame Jon Lovitz for doing what he did...that was
just his reaction for losing one of his best friends and sometimes it comes out as anger and the need to blame someone. According to Andy Dick, Brinn sought Andy out for some Coke and Andy claims that he had no idea that she was clean for ten years. It was such a tragedy and I blame no one but Brinn, she's the one that pulled the trigger and it's a shame that she took Phil with her. I heard that she was a pretty screwed up woman with or without drugs! Good post! 
posted by
RckyMtnActivist
on July 19, 2007 at 8:22 AM
| link to this | reply