Comments on Clark: Dark Horse or Clinton ‘Stalking Horse’?

Go to DEFENSEWATCHAdd a commentGo to Clark: Dark Horse or Clinton ‘Stalking Horse’?

If you have to ask, I'm not sure you will understand the answer.

These two guuys couldn't be more different. I'll point out only one for now: Clark seems to put his finger into the air, test the wind, and develop an opinion that matches. Bush, on the other hand, sets out his convictions up front, and then keeps to the track, regardless of public opinion. In his words, he has a job to do, and he's going to do it.

Do yourself a favor and avoid the left-wing spin that the media is popularizing. When the dust settles, Bush will carry the day. I predict that history will be VERY kind to this president.

posted by arGee on October 5, 2003 at 5:41 PM | link to this | reply

Clark
So what makes him so differnt than the one we've already got in the White House?

posted by Bobbieo on October 5, 2003 at 4:04 PM | link to this | reply

I would not be surprised if we couldn't find more congruent points...
..nevertheless, I appreciate your posts and response to me. From my perspective, there are significant differences between Bush and Clinton. I had the privilege of knowing the elder Bush personally, and found him to be homest, sincere, and genuinely good. I believe the acorn didn't fall very far from the tree. I suspect history will treat George W. very well.

posted by arGee on October 5, 2003 at 3:57 PM | link to this | reply

i can't remember another time i agreed with you,
but this is a good article - i've had my suspicions all along.  however, in my opinion,the clintons and bush's are the same type of people - money-making puppets.

posted by chick312 on October 5, 2003 at 12:56 PM | link to this | reply