Go to The Reverend Kooka Speaks About Religious Bulls#!t
- Add a comment
- Go to WHY DO THERE SEEM TO BE MORE LIARS WHO BELIEVE IN GOD THAN DON'T?
they're saved -- they can lie
posted by
Xeno-x
on April 13, 2007 at 8:26 AM
| link to this | reply
kooka_lives - the really sad part is that this attrocious and extremely
childish behaviour is reserved strictly for non believers.
It matters not how much of a dispicable reprobate a person may be, if they profess a belief in God; they will never endure this kind of behaviour from this individual.
posted by
gomedome
on April 12, 2007 at 8:55 PM
| link to this | reply
gomedome
I believe he wrote that post after I blocked him because he continued to insult my beliefs with his comment towards me. I would tell him what the insult was and why it was an insult and he would claim it was not and then insult me yet again in the same manner. I do wonder what he considers to be insults at times.
And of course him, being as grown up and mature spatially as he is, went and wrote a post that was more or less nothing but name calling towards myself and you in response to us blocking him. You gotta love it when they make our own points for us.
posted by
kooka_lives
on April 12, 2007 at 8:33 PM
| link to this | reply
kooka_lives - I didn't mean to get this nonsense started up again
Say the word and I will withdraw.
posted by
gomedome
on April 12, 2007 at 8:30 PM
| link to this | reply
It's tough conversing with someone that has the memory of a gnat and only
marginally more intellectual capacity.
There really is only one person that has continually used the word "iconoclast" on Blogit. The term was never used as a compliment but instead utilized as a term of derision to label a few select bloggers. There is no mistaking the sentiment or intent of that particular person when using this word as the disdain that it harbors has been reinforced numerous times in blog postings and comments: HERE is an example. It is used as an insult plain and simple. When that person refers to both Kooka and myself as an inconoclast in the opening line of a comment, I have no reason to consider it as anything but an insult. So spare us yet another attempt at pretending to be the wounded party. You have always started the name calling, you have always claimed innocence afterwards and it is likely that Kooka would like to thank you for giving a real time demonstration of exactly what this post is about.
posted by
gomedome
on April 12, 2007 at 8:26 PM
| link to this | reply
Oddy, are you saying
That when you said 'Are you two Iconoclasts still in here raving at the religious?' there was nothing at all possibly insulting about that? That was your very first comment towards both gomedome and myself, when we had said nothing to you. You come in here opening up with what may seem light, but is clearly a strongly implied insult, and then try to act as if you are the victim because gomedome got insulted and came back at you.
posted by
kooka_lives
on April 12, 2007 at 8:20 PM
| link to this | reply
Kooka……Hahaha…..you think I’m the one that’s being insulting here?
Hahaha. Listen, I’m outta here, this is not going to work. See ya!
posted by
telemachus
on April 12, 2007 at 7:48 PM
| link to this | reply
Oddy
Although you did start off with something of an insult here, as long as you do not return to the level of ignorance you achieved that caused me to end up blocking you, I won't stop you from commenting here. Just try to not be as insulting as you have been in the past, even if you claim ignorance of it that still does not mean it did not happen.
posted by
kooka_lives
on April 12, 2007 at 7:32 PM
| link to this | reply
Kooka….I’ll be happy to exit your blog if you like.....
….all ya got to do is ask. I had comments from you in my absence and was just trying to be cordial.
posted by
telemachus
on April 12, 2007 at 7:29 PM
| link to this | reply
Oddy
Well, you're back I see.
And ready to go on about all your great knowledge that can save the world from itself no doubt.
And I've had a really good evening. Just finished up a Scout meeting. Life is so great when you don't have the burden of religious thinking or some B.S. concept of God to weigh you down and ruin your spirituality
posted by
kooka_lives
on April 12, 2007 at 7:28 PM
| link to this | reply
gomedome
I saw that he was back and groaned. It was a nice little break from him though. Not as long as the last time. And I don't blame you for him being around.
posted by
kooka_lives
on April 12, 2007 at 7:26 PM
| link to this | reply
If you were intellectually capable of smacking someone in the head,
you wouldn’t be hiding in a blocked blog. All you can do is throw out rude names, which is exemplary of your lack of moral decency.
posted by
telemachus
on April 12, 2007 at 7:10 PM
| link to this | reply
kooka_lives - I didn't bring the peanut gallery to your blog this time
It followed me like the dumb puppy that just keeps peeing on the carpet no matter how many times you smack it in the head.
posted by
gomedome
on April 12, 2007 at 6:53 PM
| link to this | reply
Are you two Iconoclasts still in here raving at the religious?
Geez, you two do seem to make a religion out of non-religion! Anyway, I hope you both had a really good day today. Blessings to you and your families! J
posted by
telemachus
on April 12, 2007 at 6:44 PM
| link to this | reply
kooka_lives- I can say that my life experiences and the time that I have
been here on Blogit both support what you are saying.
I don't know why I am still shocked when I am subjected to such duplicity from the faithful but I am. It could be the fact that they are representing the exact opposite in proclaiming a belief in something that is supposed to make people better. It makes one wonder how they cannot see what clowns they are. From our long departed Harvard graduate/MENSA member/gospel preacher who had zero credibility, to the wannabe messiah intent on saving all non believers but denied every last one of his numerous transgressions, to everyone's favourite pastor who was caught lying more times than we can count, the list is extensive. This is not just a coincidence. Though the numbers of believers versus non believers is a much greater sampling and will by virtue of these greater numbers contain more head cases, why is it that not one person (to my knowledge) that has professed non belief in this public forum has been caught in any of these lies? .....this is not just a coincidence either.
posted by
gomedome
on April 12, 2007 at 6:31 PM
| link to this | reply