Go to Holy Church of Blog
- Add a comment
- Go to So, did you see that they may have found Jesus's family's tombs?
If Jesus was resurected how could his remains be in a box???? Hmmmmm
posted by
1TimeSoldier
on March 6, 2007 at 9:57 AM
| link to this | reply
Ben, not everyone does but you have to admit that it's common
posted by
SuccessWarrior
on February 27, 2007 at 2:11 PM
| link to this | reply
taxguy, I think a lot of people are going to be disappointed
when they get to the other side. Me, if there's something after this, I'm going to be full of wonder.
posted by
SuccessWarrior
on February 27, 2007 at 2:11 PM
| link to this | reply
Gome, that very well could be the truth of it
On the other hand, the guy had to be buried somewhere.
posted by
SuccessWarrior
on February 27, 2007 at 2:10 PM
| link to this | reply
Ariel, it might be there and just not found.
I'll watch for further developments.
posted by
SuccessWarrior
on February 27, 2007 at 2:09 PM
| link to this | reply
Not everyone goes running to God or religion as a panacea when they're sick. (grin)
posted by
kidnykid
on February 27, 2007 at 1:53 PM
| link to this | reply
Faith Is Faith
We will not the anwers until we get to the other side of the veil. If we were given full disclosure on all that happened, theri would be no faith to test. Thans for the post.
posted by
taxguy
on February 27, 2007 at 12:42 PM
| link to this | reply
SuccessWarrior - I have my doubts about this story which may be nothing
more than a means to sell a movie.
The first question that arises is even though Jesus himself was supposedly crucified near this newly discovered tomb, his family was from the Galilee region. This would be like finding an entire family from Los Angeles buried in San Francisco. Where I don't buy much of the biblical version of events either and I agree that most conflicting information was either destroyed or covered up, this story has a lot of unanswered questions.
posted by
gomedome
on February 27, 2007 at 12:30 PM
| link to this | reply
Success
There's not one for Kilroy, then?
posted by
ariel70
on February 27, 2007 at 11:53 AM
| link to this | reply