Go to IT CURES HOARSENESS! The "Global Warming" Hoax
- Add a comment
- Go to Why Computer Projections about "Global Warming" Are Unreliable
That's it precisely, Xenox!
"incomplete data results in incomplete answers."
And that's exactly the problem. How "complete" is what's being dumped into these computers? How accurate is it? How comprehensive? How free of skewing?
Given the notoriously incomplete nature of climatology and meteorology, any computer projections based on these sciences are going to be incomplete.
And about your polar bears, rising sea levels and so forth - I'm still waiting for you to prove the extent that human activity is contributing to this in any significant way when compared to the influence of the sun and other natural factors.
posted by
WriterofLight
on February 21, 2007 at 7:03 PM
| link to this | reply
WHAT THAT BOOK SAYS IS
at least it seems to me
incomplete data results in incomplete answers
but from what I have read and seen, the data so far tells us of the reality of Global Warming, and the results (which I have listed) are inordinately clear.
I have shown you definite date regarding polar bears, that their numbers are indeed increasing due to less hunting, but that the Hudson's Bay population has decreased by upwards of 20% due to the dwindling ice pack there.
populations in South Pacific and Indian Ocean islands don't have to be told that sea levels are going to rise; they are already displaced by that already happening.
I have been to the Rocky Mountains, near the top of a 14'er, where snow should have been but wasn't. My son-in-law, who has lived there all his life, said that the snow, which usually is on the mountains year-round, has all but disappeared.
we can talk about glaciers til doomsday, but the information that comes to me is that they are receding more than ever.
and the antarctic ice sheets -- well, let me write a post on that.
posted by
Xeno-x
on February 21, 2007 at 10:20 AM
| link to this | reply