Go to IT CURES HOARSENESS! The "Global Warming" Hoax
- Add a comment
- Go to So you think the "global warming" debate is over, eh?
"WHAT WE'VE GOT HERE IS HYPOTHESIS AND EXPERIMENTAL" - Xenox
yes, Yes, OH, YES!! 
You're finally grasping this, good Xenox! 
What's that? 
You were referring to the story I posted, and not to the experimental and hypothetical claims of the global warmers? 
Once again - climate change happens. The argument is about why. Where are your proofs that human activity is causing it, and where are your refutations of natural causes and of the flaws being identified in "global warming" theory?
Remember - they have to refutations of data and observations. Sorry, ad hominem attacks ("sounds like a supporter of big business and the oil industry to me. sounds like he has an agenda") don't cut it unless you can prove what he says wrong without demonstrating your apparent contempt for his profession.
posted by
WriterofLight
on February 14, 2007 at 1:11 PM
| link to this | reply
you also forgot to add that the author
Steven Milloy publishes JunkScience.com and CSRWatch.com. He is a junk science expert , an advocate of free enterprise and an adjunct scholar at the Competitive Enterprise Institute .
sounds like a supporter of big business and the oil industry to me. sounds like he has an agenda
posted by
Xeno-x
on February 13, 2007 at 7:26 AM
| link to this | reply
WHAT WE'VE GOT HERE IS HYPOTHESIS AND EXPERIMENTAL
according to the story.
so where are the observations?
has it been shown that the cloud cover is decreasing?
hypotheses need proof to bring them past the theorizing phase
and nobody has answered my questions
the indications of global warming that i have listed
you will earn a lot more credence when you address these. they seem to be definite evidence of global warming. all you have to do is demonstrate differently
posted by
Xeno-x
on February 13, 2007 at 7:21 AM
| link to this | reply
This just does not fit the news that the left wants, and needs, to hear.
posted by
sarooster
on February 12, 2007 at 6:05 PM
| link to this | reply