Go to A Distant Drum of the Coming Revolution
- Add a comment
- Go to Was Laura Bush Right to Not Disclose Skin Cancer Treatment?
writeroflight I just wanted
to add this we all know when Betty Ford, as First Lady underwent a masectomy in 1974 and also in 1987 Nancy Reagan underwent a masectomy.
I think it educated women each time and I think Laura Bush could have done the same thing to tell people to have themselves checked.
posted by
scoop
on December 28, 2006 at 7:19 AM
| link to this | reply
skin cancer
I think she should have disclosed to educate. Many people do not understand skin cancer. I know of someone who is going in to the doctor to have a mole checked and she did look at photos of what Laura's cancer would look like.
posted by
Zenned
on December 27, 2006 at 7:20 PM
| link to this | reply
Well if people don't know about skin cancer by now
They never will...I think she has the right to privacy and exercised that right. There will always be the loonies who say she should have said something, but for the most part, they don't like her anyway...so her critics are just going to use this as a way of making an issue out of Laura's personal decision.
posted by
Offy
on December 27, 2006 at 6:06 PM
| link to this | reply
I think most first families whether democrat or republican have been open
about there lives, I think the public should know. I can't think of anything hidden can you, if so can you share it?
posted by
scoop
on December 27, 2006 at 5:57 PM
| link to this | reply