Go to Here's A Thought: One Thing A Penny Still Buys
            - Add a comment
            - Go to Reality Versus Revisionism
        
        
                
                
                    You are exactly right, Parnell.  It is becoming, or has become, perjorative
                
                in the mainstream, especially among the more liberal or open-minded when speaking about conservatives' renditions of the 'good ole days' and the founding fathers, among other things... A revised period or account of a certain personage in history after extensive research and backed by data and sound sources isn't such a terrible thing.  Take, for instance, Richard Zacks new account of the notorious pirate, 
Captain Kidd...
                
                    posted by
                    saul_relative
                     on December 12, 2006 at 10:19 PM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    Saul
                
                    I totally accept your point. Well stated as always. What I meant is that in academic history circles 'revisionism' doesn't always have a perjorative connotation. It often just refers to a legitimate, well-researched, by definitively new slant on a historical topic.
  I think the media is changing the use of the word, and I've heard opinion journalists refer to it as a perjorative term...
                
                    posted by
                    Antipodean
                     on December 12, 2006 at 8:14 PM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    I would have to agree with you on that, Parnell.  Except that when history 
                
                is written based on empirical data, or a logical extrapolation thereof, it isn't revised or revisionist.  Revisionism is more of an opinionated slant on a given topic, such as all the founding fathers being god-fearing Christians, which is untrue, in order to get a proper perspective on the intent of the Constitution.  Worst cases are those espoused by groups such as the KKK and Aryan Supremacists and those radical Christians who place dinosaurs in the garden of Eden with Adam and Eve.
                
                    posted by
                    saul_relative
                     on December 10, 2006 at 8:59 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    Saul
                
                Hang-on a sec - Sometimes revisionists are right and the traditionalists are wrong. Depends on the topic...
                
                    posted by
                    Antipodean
                     on December 10, 2006 at 12:21 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    Thank you, afzal.
                
                
                
                    posted by
                    saul_relative
                     on December 9, 2006 at 11:11 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    And I shall, Blanche, until some jackbooted, sunglasses-wearing goon at  
                
                my -- hold on, someone's at the door...
                
                    posted by
                    saul_relative
                     on December 9, 2006 at 11:11 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    There's no spin like Snow spin, eh, scoop?
                
                
                
                    posted by
                    saul_relative
                     on December 9, 2006 at 11:09 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    Thanks, teddypoet.
                
                
                
                    posted by
                    saul_relative
                     on December 9, 2006 at 11:08 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    Nicely defined .
                
                
                
                    posted by
                    afzal50
                     on December 9, 2006 at 10:19 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    You tell them, Saul, how it REALLY is,not this air-brushed fantasy 
                
                
                
                    posted by
                    Blanche.
                     on December 9, 2006 at 10:08 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    Saul
                
                unless Tony Snow tells you what it is and then it is Republican gospel
                
                    posted by
                    scoop
                     on December 9, 2006 at 10:02 AM
                    | link to this | reply
                    
                
            
                
                
                    It is just as you say, my friend! Nice one...
                
                     
  
                
                    posted by
                    teddypoet_TheGoodByeFade
                     on December 9, 2006 at 9:49 AM
                    | link to this | reply