Go to PLAY FAIR OR TAKE YOUR BALL AND GO HOME
- Add a comment
- Go to HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF SUCH AS THAT?
ROFLMAO at Corbin, you are such a wit,. We won, and like you said in 2000
Move on and get with the program. 31 seats in the House, 6 Senate seats, and 28 governors. DEMOCRATS are in charge, and we will do what is right, for a change.
posted by
Blanche.
on November 15, 2006 at 3:33 PM
| link to this | reply
Justi
I am pleasantly amazed at how many Dems have moved to the center..It gives me hope!
posted by
Offy
on November 15, 2006 at 3:31 PM
| link to this | reply
Well, justi....
the inmates aren't in control of the asylum, just yet.......perhaps they were all out picking out drapes?
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on November 15, 2006 at 5:19 AM
| link to this | reply
Justi
Indulge me a bit...
Equally bizarre, in my mind, is the presumed right by the U.S. to “detain” suspected al Qaeda supporters simply (or seemingly) on a suspicion. There is no actual al Qaeda “membership” list nor is there a firm criterion on which this decision is based. Immigrants arrested in the United States may be held indefinitely on suspicion of terrorism and may not challenge their imprisonment in civilian courts. This is the doing of the Bush administration.
For example, Kahlah al-Marri, a citizen of Qatar, was arrested in 2001 while studying in the United States and is being held at a military prison in South Carolina as an "enemy combatant." He remains in custody.
The new law says that enemy combatants will be tried before military commissions, not a civilian judge or jury, and establishes different rules of evidence in the cases. It also prohibits such detainees from challenging their detention in civilian court... Human rights groups and attorneys for the detainees say the law is unconstitutional.
Ya think?
Thanks for listening.....
posted by
Troosha
on November 14, 2006 at 4:35 PM
| link to this | reply
I think I heard that they will promise not to listen to terrorist commmunications and invade their privacy anymore, Justi.
Can you believe that? What are they thinking?
posted by
MaggieMae
on November 14, 2006 at 10:48 AM
| link to this | reply
I didn't see anything of this nature in the news. Pls share your source.
posted by
blogflogger
on November 13, 2006 at 10:42 PM
| link to this | reply
Mmmmm
Talk about what's
not good for the goose
is good for the gander!
posted by
Tanga
on November 13, 2006 at 10:19 PM
| link to this | reply
Justi,
And I did write a post today, if only a little one...
posted by
Nautikos
on November 13, 2006 at 4:27 PM
| link to this | reply
Justi,
I wonder what the WP and the NYT are going to make of that! Wasn't that one of the reasons advanced as grounds for the impeachment of President Bush?
posted by
Nautikos
on November 13, 2006 at 4:26 PM
| link to this | reply