Go to Did I Say That?
- Add a comment
- Go to Does Actor Charlie Sheen Post on Blogit?
Bits and pieces of fact?
it really did look like a demolition to me
Now, in my opinion, there's some facts.....LOL
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on March 28, 2006 at 8:34 AM
| link to this | reply
not that i am any smarter
(although i do score high on certain tests -- usually in the 98 percentile)
but I try to bring to any argument evidence and substantial counter arguments. (except maybe in cases where the writer expresses insubstantial opinions).
you already have an opinion here. You drew a conclusion and made statements just from innuendo.
I brought up bits and pieces of evidence showing how people can draw a conclusion similar to Mr. Sheen's.
And I am fairly certain that these conclusions are not exclusive to liberals, as you would have people believe.
again -- a blanket statement without substantiation.
in arguing, reason should prevail, not empty rhetoric.
my issue with you and so many here is that you draw the conclusion first, then you either fail to present evidence to back up your conclusion -- or you manufacture evidence.
valid conclusions come from valid evidence.
although I hesitate to put you down and make myself look superior (and I really am not all that superior), I do believe that you have failed to bring anything substantial to this particular table, and I think I have attempted to do so..
that's what makes me superior in this instance.
posted by
Xeno-x
on March 28, 2006 at 8:21 AM
| link to this | reply
Xeno.....
That's like me asking what makes you any smarter than I am.......
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on March 28, 2006 at 5:01 AM
| link to this | reply
Corbin
I have no idea of why they give this man air time. He's not funny, not handsome, can't act, he's not in the real world. He is so full of himself and there are people (typically the one's who can't think for themselves) who believe his crap...Hollywood does America no favors and are fast at Monday morning quarter backing...He is a piece of work that one!!!
posted by
Offy
on March 27, 2006 at 3:23 PM
| link to this | reply
odd
it really did look like a demolition to me --
whether controlled or not? -- the way the towers went down could raise all sorts of speculaiotn.
but the sabateurs did know what they were doing -- flying jets with full tanks into the towers -- huge flying molotov cocktails.
and about the bos cutter thing -- that was stupid to allow them on board.
but of course -- airport security was lousy for decades anyway in spite of numerous warnings about the problem -- but it was some of these stuck up rich folks that you support that complained and forced the lax security in the first place that allowed the box cutters on board in the first place. If security has been anything like it should have been, 9/11 wouldn't have happened. The sabateurs tested the security numberous times before acting and found that they could take the box cutters through airport security.
but lots of people -- especially conservatives, i would imagine, think that there was a conspiracy of the sort spoken about by Sheen.
besides, what makes you any smarter than he is?
posted by
Xeno-x
on March 27, 2006 at 2:58 PM
| link to this | reply
Corbin...
Exactly where in my comment did I attack you personally?
And where (anywhere) on Blogit do I even remotely suggest that everything must be the world according to Dennison?
And please, keep your pity. I don't want it and your subtle passive-aggressive tactics only reveal how seriously desperate you are in your aggression.
DM
posted by
Dennison..Mann
on March 25, 2006 at 10:00 AM
| link to this | reply
DM
everything can't be the "World According to Dennison". So am am happy to return the favor, why should I give you clicks when you choose to get so personal with your comments all of the time.
If you don't like my opinions....don't read them.....and your crack about my intentions on Scoops post is bull shit.......as I explained the reason I corrected it was to prevent a click from occurring......I find people who post links to their Blogs in others comments "parasitic".
If I am wrong on this click thing would someone point this out?
If you click on a comment....and are taken just to the comment section.....it doesn't count as a click for the post the comments are with. ......that's why I put my response to Scoop in my Comments.......
I thought there were many here that were doing this...that's why sometimes as people are quickly making their "Comment" round they aren't actually reading the posted material......they're not giving clicks.....they are just commenting......for the sake of commenting and that's why sometimes you want to ask someone what are you talking about....because it obvious they never read the body of the post.
I know you can't help being a pompous ass...it's just your nature and I feel sorry for you......
posted by
Corbin_Dallas
on March 25, 2006 at 8:23 AM
| link to this | reply
Corbin...
You seriously need to take a course or two in basic logic.
In this entry, you've is taken the characteristics of an individual and applied them to the collective with no real validity.
Let's take the insane rantings of Pat Robertson and apply them to the whole of the Republican party, okay?
This is why I don't read you but most infrequently. You are too bent on seeing things your way and your way only. And that offers nothing of value to me. I don't want your illogical interpretation of what this side or that side is doing. In fact, I don't want anyone's illogical interpretation of what's going on. I just want the news. I don't give a crap what Charlie Sheen says because Charlie Sheen doesn't run my government, and Charlie Sheen doesn't pay my bills.
I'd read your blog more often if you'd stop saying all liberals think "this way" simply because you've managed to siphon some anecdotal story about a strung-out actor.
Your blogs rarely offer anything fair and certainly nothing balanced. I see no real value in reading them at all.
And your "correct link" strategy on Scoop's recent post about the Zogby survey demonstrated for me just how despearate you are for attention. You seem to know no limits in your race to the bottom.
This was not a personal attack. I'm just letting you know why I am barely inclined to read you.
DM
posted by
Dennison..Mann
on March 25, 2006 at 7:36 AM
| link to this | reply