Go to Religion in the Modern World
- Add a comment
- Go to Is one little setback going to stop the Intelligent Design proponents?
DrJPT - thank you -- your comment suggest that ......
...I'm getting the hang of this English language.
posted by
gomedome
on January 3, 2006 at 7:37 AM
| link to this | reply
I Appreciate Your Posts
It helps me think clearly by clarifying issues.
posted by
Dr_JPT
on January 3, 2006 at 6:17 AM
| link to this | reply
Thank you Melody
and thanx for reading
posted by
gomedome
on January 3, 2006 at 6:14 AM
| link to this | reply
Gomedome, enjoyed your post.
I found this article interesting too when I read it last week. I'm sure Pat Robertson is very upset over the ruling and will try to come back with something to discern the Big Bang Theory. I can see him claiming ID suffered indigestion approximately 15 billion years ago...and the result:
gases setting off the 'Bean Bang' and thus the origin of evolution. 
Melody
posted by
CunningLinguist
on January 2, 2006 at 6:27 PM
| link to this | reply
jollyjeff - thank you -that's the gaping hole that ID proponents just will
not accept. They have pre-defined the designer from an abstract concept they call religious faith and have put that portion of the so called "theory" on lock down. For them, there is no examining who or what the designer may be, which ultimately reduces the contention to an agenda and nothing more. In the real world of scientific discovery, the entire contention being advanced as a premise for a theory, must be subjected to scrutiny. Not just the parts that people want to advance. This doesn't even begin to address what in actual fact constitutes a scientific theory. ID proponents don't want to hear that part.
posted by
gomedome
on January 2, 2006 at 3:23 PM
| link to this | reply
Interesting Post
I never thought about the idea that beings more advanced than we are could have created things.
posted by
jollyjeff
on January 2, 2006 at 2:51 PM
| link to this | reply