Comments on Bi-partisan "attack" on Bush

Go to 44: The Obama PresidencyAdd a commentGo to Bi-partisan "attack" on Bush

davideskin

Well, it was a wimpy non-binding resolution......

The party is solidly behind GW........the problem is that  you  aren't required to have a set of ca hones to be in a leadership position with the GOP Senate majority.

posted by Corbin_Dallas on November 17, 2005 at 6:21 AM | link to this | reply