Comments on Rats and Slot-machines: Why we keep using solutions that don't always work

Go to How the Universe looks from hereAdd a commentGo to Rats and Slot-machines: Why we keep using solutions that don't always work

Sannhet, I think that would change the world!

 And only if everyone defined 'love' the same way would it not have an element of chaos, I'm thinking!  It would make this world a whole different classroom, too, to eliminate the essential dichotomy. 

What do you think are the chances of it happening?

posted by Ciel on May 25, 2005 at 9:21 AM | link to this | reply

Ciel -
I don't know. If everyone came from a position of love, then would chaos reign?

posted by sannhet on May 25, 2005 at 7:32 AM | link to this | reply

freedom of the soul and chaos to society,I am seeing nature or animals but I see the value of freedom/soul more than society. in nature it seems to protect oneself and teritory is more worth than material and social contracts that are invaded changed and tested constantly.I dont mean to drag what you wrote off to a new channel but after reading it again I was thinking of nature with soul and society with contract that to me is always on thin ice.      Jeremy

posted by appleworks7 on May 24, 2005 at 5:10 PM | link to this | reply

Hi Ciel

The upside and the downside you speak of  which depends on the person. with different persons having different balanced up and downsides of freedom of soul and will,this you mean from a personal balance but as a group or by being an influence my balance may be what sets another spinning likeatom.does this make sense to you ?or maybe I see it different from interpreting,or maybe reading it once and replying I have forgotten the most of it. thanks

Jeremy

posted by appleworks7 on May 24, 2005 at 4:55 PM | link to this | reply