Go to Spitfire- The Aries Poster Child
- Add a comment
- Go to Are These Pics Kiddie Porn?? Are Any Hanging on YOUR Walls?
Oh, and btw, Temple,
I used to run around my house completely naked on purpose until I was about 6 or 7 years old. (I have no idea
why!) My mom finally pulled me aside and told me it was "not appropriate for little girls to run around with no clothes on in front of her brother and daddy" anymore. I couldn't really understand why at the time, but I stopped doing it. All I remembered from before the day Mom told me that was my dad yelling, "There goes the Nudy Racoody again!" I was a streaker at heart, I guess! Damn, I've now told all of Blogit of this crap, haven't I?? Yeeks.
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 17, 2005 at 2:15 AM
| link to this | reply
Geez, Temple, you're just too damn cute.
I just wanted to be safe and legal when taking those pics off Photobucket cause they weren't "mine" and I only used that site to upload those pics to my blog. (Am I just too paranoid or what?!) Anyway, I am sure Jimmy is quite satisfied with the nekkidness of you; whenever, wherever!
Can't blame him, though!
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 17, 2005 at 2:09 AM
| link to this | reply
You're not an idiot, you're a cool broad. :)
I'm never quite sure the whole legality of pics on the internet. I think you were probably okay though. Anyway, the kiddy porn thing is so crazy now. What's appropriate, what's not. We used to just run around half naked all the time and be nuts, and there are pics of that. There is this book about the human body, really seems sort of borderline to me. But, maybe we are all too uptight about sex here in the U.S. anyway. Places like Sweden and Switzerland have far fewer problems with sex crimes, teen pregnancy, STDs, things like that because they make sex just natural, not with any religious or societal restrictions. That works for me, because I don't believe in restrictions like that. (Jimmy likes that part, too.
)
posted by
Temple
on March 17, 2005 at 1:07 AM
| link to this | reply
Temple, I'm an idiot.
See, I used Photobucket for those pics so I could get the URL to copy them into the blog. They weren't my copyrighted pics, so after I posted the blog, I later on went and deleted them from my photobucket account.
Sorry.
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 16, 2005 at 5:51 PM
| link to this | reply
I would comment...
But the pictures are all gone...?
posted by
Temple
on March 16, 2005 at 1:10 AM
| link to this | reply
Also, Inn-K-D, it's funny you mentioned
Anne "what's her name" cause I originally had that in this post, but checked out her work before I posted it and it turns out that she does the cute ones. Like, with the babies dressed up as bumble bees, or a corn on the cob and stuff. So, she's okay. Oh, and her name is Anne Geddes. In my original post, I put "Anne Whatever-the-hell-her name is". Just thought it was funny you worded it that way in your comment!
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 14, 2005 at 6:21 PM
| link to this | reply
InnK-D, I agree. It's just odd.
I can't imagine being a 3, 4, or 5 year old model and be told to kiss someone on the lips.
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 14, 2005 at 6:17 PM
| link to this | reply
spitfire...
I have always been bothered by the Ann what's her name pictures of babies. Fine take adorable pictures of babies FOR THEIR FAMILIES but once you start making money off of them, that's just not right. I can't quite put my money on it but it's wrong. Like using the kids. I have no idea what the kids get out of being subjects but it almost feels like the kids are being used to me.
posted by
theinnkeepersdaughter
on March 14, 2005 at 4:08 AM
| link to this | reply
Dennis, no, I hear ya, but
we as adults are already tainted! My point was really more about the little toddlers in photos, and they probably are strangers to one another! These aren't cute pics taken by parents. They are child models most of the time. Yucky.
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 13, 2005 at 2:08 PM
| link to this | reply
Rach,
It's one thing to have them of your own kids, but when photographers POSE kids doing that and then market the pics, um, somethings really disturbing about that. Could you imagine one of the girls doing a photo shoot with a little boy model and you are hearing him tell them to kiss? Eeeew. It's just creepy!
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 13, 2005 at 2:06 PM
| link to this | reply
JJ, it's also a parental revenge for when they
pull out the pics of us as a baby while sitting in the tub or on the potty when a date showed up to pick us up. I'm lucky, though. My mom didn't do that to me. In fact, I don't have many baby pics. Luckily, I don't think I even ever saw one of me nekkid. Thank God. Oh, and about the YLF thing going on around here, I have only a slight idea, but I don't get involved in that crap. Wait, I see a halo above my head. Maybe I am an angel.
Woops, that lightning bolt almost got me. I best be shutting up now. 
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 13, 2005 at 2:04 PM
| link to this | reply
Symph, exactly.
That's why I did the comparisons here. Some are just over the top.
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 13, 2005 at 1:57 PM
| link to this | reply
Probably NOT, renegade!!
But I must say, it is kinda cute that they share those together!
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 13, 2005 at 1:56 PM
| link to this | reply
Sass, you're right! I forgot the heavenly food!!
And the Angel's Food cake! (Or in yours and my case, maybe it'll be Devil's Cake?) hehe
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 13, 2005 at 1:55 PM
| link to this | reply
Wham,
It was more about the second part than the cherubs!!
posted by
SpitFire70
on March 13, 2005 at 1:53 PM
| link to this | reply
Fire
I have to say, I've never been bothered by the angles looking like children (Whatever they are called)
To me, the reason they are always portraid as children is because children, babies in particular, are supposed to be of complete innocence, having not been tainted and "soiled" by Earthly life. Therefore, for an angel who is supposed to be of complete innocence and as pure as one can be, children and babies make the perfect representation of an angel. It's all about the "representation" of purity, not the death of kids.
As for the kids kissing...well...their gonna do it when they get older anyway right? I suppose if it's with strangers, then it's porn. But, if it's with releatives, it's not? Hey, that's the way it works in West Virginia, anyway, even after adulthood. 
posted by
Dennis_Kemano
on March 13, 2005 at 9:37 AM
| link to this | reply
LMAO!
I have all the naked, and sometimes kissing, kids in my house. I don't need to look outside these four walls for this stuff! :)
posted by
RachelAnna
on March 13, 2005 at 8:25 AM
| link to this | reply
I;m back....
Most of those daahhling little wing flappers look like they were outfitted by the Jessica Simpson Buffalo Wing Corp. And they all look like they're pondering where they are going to get the bucks to get into Weight Watcher's.
Well, we all know what little angels kids are once we: get over that foot that was fractured saving the Ming vase that almost bit concrete, finish hosing the spaghetti that was so cute at dinner off of their heads, have little Fifi's ear sewn back on at the Vet's after the barking, grabbing, pulling, biting, yelping, crying incident at breakfast, and forget countless other things. And what's the deal on the nut who has been pasting that baby picture in everyone's comment areas? I think it has been YLF (YouLousyFuk), but I'm not sure what's happening there. Buncha people tied up in that deal.
Well, thanx 4 the post. It got me pissed off. 
JJ... Yore Guardian Angel
posted by
Jack_Flash
on March 13, 2005 at 5:50 AM
| link to this | reply
oh, I have to agree with you again....
I think their are limits....you know?
posted by
_Symphony_
on March 13, 2005 at 1:10 AM
| link to this | reply
M:y mom and her sister love those silly cherubs. Mom thinks she's one
and Aunt R. thinks she's another, and they each have memorobilia from their respective angels ALL over the place. They have key chains, coffee mugs, coasters, blankets, you name it...However, I think they probably don't fit the bill as being pedophiles...
posted by
Renigade
on March 12, 2005 at 9:34 PM
| link to this | reply
Adorable pics
I have to agree with you on this one. I have never liked Cherubs. My mother-in-law collects angels and they don't do a thing for me. The idea of using babies is morbid. By the way, when writing your description of angels, you forgot to add the bagel with cream cheese. Thats how I see myself when I become an angel. Laying on my cloud, stuffing my face with this heavenly food.
posted by
Sherri_G
on March 12, 2005 at 9:26 PM
| link to this | reply
SpitFire,
My mother had cherubs, and I cannot reconcile an image of my Mom as a Kiddie Pornist, so I simply could not read your entire post. Mom was a good woman! How dare you....
posted by
WHAMENATOR
on March 12, 2005 at 9:07 PM
| link to this | reply