Comments on If you can explain this blogomenon* to me, then you are a frickin' genius!!

Go to I WRITE, THEREFORE I AMAdd a commentGo to If you can explain this blogomenon* to me, then you are a frickin' genius!!

quirky....
are you sure rocky isn't moonlighting and trying to boost an un-known blog? lol

posted by littlemspickles on January 29, 2005 at 3:36 PM | link to this | reply

Quirky
I've noticed that just a click or two on a blog in a 'less popular' category such as this one can cause it to jump way up in the rankings, even if it's really old.  Of course this one will be number 1 now!!    

posted by Holy_Grail on January 28, 2005 at 6:33 PM | link to this | reply

This mention will push it up some more
We never know who is quietly clicking.

posted by beachbelle on January 28, 2005 at 11:01 AM | link to this | reply

Another communist plot played upon the masses of course

posted by the-loanlady on January 28, 2005 at 10:57 AM | link to this | reply

Clue me in when you find out what the deal is. Ta.

posted by word.smith on January 28, 2005 at 8:21 AM | link to this | reply

Its beyond me....

posted by Ca88andra on January 28, 2005 at 4:23 AM | link to this | reply

Quirk,
JJ seems to have a pretty valid explanation and knowledge of this, but I dunno. I don't really question stuff like this anymore cause I've contemplated strange rankings and accumulated earnings since I joined 1 1/2 years ago. I just always assume it's whatever it is and I leave it at that!   Interesting findings, here, though. I wonder about it now...

posted by SpitFire70 on January 27, 2005 at 10:22 PM | link to this | reply

qwerty, I took a look at that...the overall rankings of the top four in Humor are 11, 55, 63 and 86...so in the next few days you should see Gypsy's blog drop. It's only 7 days old...An old blog can stay up in the in rankings of the individual sections if there are huge gaps in the overall rankings.

posted by Julia. on January 27, 2005 at 8:55 PM | link to this | reply

It could have been......

This is the kind of thing that pops up for a lot of reasons.  The first thing I think of is some kind of test data that a programmer was using for a mod or a debug.  No software is perfect, I can assure you of that.  There are bound to be numerous programmers working constantly on a system like this.  It's very easy for test data to get left behind.  There might have even been test runs using it at the time you found it.

Another possibility is a software bug that has not been fixed.  Bugs, which is to say bad code, are in any complex system.  The system here is bound to have plenty--some are known but haven't been fully diagnosed for fixing, others haven't even been run into yet.  Every complex program system is that way...........      JJ

posted by Jack_Flash on January 27, 2005 at 8:54 PM | link to this | reply

Very odd!
I wish they'd screw up my ratings so I could climb the ladder! ;)

posted by ginnieb on January 27, 2005 at 8:49 PM | link to this | reply

Quirky
In the same way in which it always does with posts that should fall to the bottom but don't. Take gypsy's post in humor as an example. It shoulda fallen by now, but it hasn't. That's really weird and can only be explained by blogit somehow screwing up, or else, some people have a special methodology they use...

posted by qwertyui on January 27, 2005 at 8:45 PM | link to this | reply

qwerty...how so??

posted by Julia. on January 27, 2005 at 8:40 PM | link to this | reply

It's called
Blogit fucks up once again.

posted by qwertyui on January 27, 2005 at 8:32 PM | link to this | reply