Go to BLOGS AND THEIR IMPACT
- Add a comment
- Go to MIGHT YE THINK BUSH'S MILITARY RECORD MIGHT BE CLOUDED?
brain-challenged cons
I took at a look at that Mother Jones article (do you really think ccnews or any of the blogit neocon brigade are going to click on a LIBERAL website? Probably not, because they might actually learn something about reality!) It's clear to me that Mad George behaved shamefully in the military, and the latest revelations based on official documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by national news outlets prove it. He went AWOL for something like four months. No question of that anymore. Kerry volunteered for dangerous duty in Vietnam, served his term, did his duty, and saved a life or two. No question of that either. How could anybody with a functioning brain not see the differences between the two? It boggles my mind, I tell ya. Welcome to US, BTW.
posted by
lonebutte
on August 5, 2004 at 2:05 PM
| link to this | reply
We may never know the truth.
CBC recently reported a story that some Defence records were inadvertantly destroyed. GW's amongst them. Considering the importance of this I was shocked. Every scrap of information is usually considered sacrosanct when dealing with world leader. Papers, letters, and all are usually set aside for future research and historical use. Also to glorify der leader. Also defense records are used to determine all sorts of things from medical and pension benefits to presentation in legal proceedings. Very strange that the records of the leader of the free world would be so conveniently lost. Does this story jog a memory?
posted by
man-boy
on August 5, 2004 at 11:51 AM
| link to this | reply